These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24880960)
41. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms. Omotayo A; Elbakri I J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Increasing iterative reconstruction strength at low tube voltage in coronary CT angiography protocols using 3D-printed and Catphan Abdullah KA; McEntee MF; Reed WM; Kench PL J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 21(9):209-214. PubMed ID: 32657493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Computed tomography imaging with the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) algorithm: dependence of image quality on the blending level of reconstruction. Barca P; Giannelli M; Fantacci ME; Caramella D Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):463-473. PubMed ID: 29737491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique. Takenaga T; Katsuragawa S; Goto M; Hatemura M; Uchiyama Y; Shiraishi J Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jan; 8(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 25142743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Neointimal formation after carotid artery stenting: phantom and clinical evaluation of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Yokomachi K; Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Kume S; Sakamoto S; Okazaki T; Kurisu K; Nakamura Y; Baba Y; Iida M; Awai K Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):161-167. PubMed ID: 29934669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Image quality of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection. Yoo RE; Park EA; Lee W; Shim H; Kim YK; Chung JW; Park JH Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 22923280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of Image Quality for 7 Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in Chest Computed Tomography Imaging: A Phantom Study. Jensen K; Hagemo G; Tingberg A; Steinfeldt-Reisse C; Mynarek GK; Rivero RJ; Fosse E; Martinsen AC J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(5):673-680. PubMed ID: 32936576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom. Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study. Yoon JH; Lee JM; Hur BY; Baek J; Shim H; Han JK; Choi BI Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1843-52. PubMed ID: 25526686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques. I S; C A; H S; P T; T F J Biomed Phys Eng; 2020 Apr; 10(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 32337189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres. Prenosil GA; Klaeser B; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Berndt M; Krause T; Weitzel T Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5767. PubMed ID: 27782715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The influence of focal spot blooming on high-contrast spatial resolution in CT imaging. Grimes J; Duan X; Yu L; Halaweish AF; Haag N; Leng S; McCollough C Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6011-20. PubMed ID: 26429276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy. Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods. Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential. Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D. Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Application of Vendor-Neutral Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Pediatric Abdominal Computed Tomography. Lim WH; Choi YH; Park JE; Cho YJ; Lee S; Cheon JE; Kim WS; Kim IO; Kim JH Korean J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1358-1367. PubMed ID: 31464114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms. Evans JD; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1444-58. PubMed ID: 21520856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quality evaluation of image-based iterative reconstruction for CT: Comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction. Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Nagata H; Takata T; Kobayashi S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):199-205. PubMed ID: 31050148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]