These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article. Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data. Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to predict return to work after lumbar discectomy: answers from the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Than KD; Curran JN; Resnick DK; Shaffrey CI; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26989977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years. Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery. Glassman SD; Polly DW; Dimar JR; Carreon LY Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20489676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT). de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of obesity on cost per quality-adjusted life years gained following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in elective degenerative pathology. Chotai S; Sielatycki JA; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Kay HL; Stonko DP; Wick JB; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1342-1350. PubMed ID: 27394664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios. Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Utility Analysis of Instrumented Fusion Versus Decompression Alone for Grade I L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis at 1-Year Follow-up: A Pilot Study. Alvin MD; Lubelski D; Abdullah KG; Whitmore RG; Benzel EC; Mroz TE Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):E80-6. PubMed ID: 26889996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Adogwa O; Parker SL; Davis BJ; Aaronson O; Devin C; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Aug; 15(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 21529203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion. Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing clinical outcomes of repeat discectomy versus fusion for recurrent disc herniation utilizing the N Guan J; Ravindra VM; Schmidt MH; Dailey AT; Hood RS; Bisson EF J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jan; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27517528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome. Ghogawala Z; Whitmore RG; Watters WC; Sharan A; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Groff MW; Wang JC; Resnick DK; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24980580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention. Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-utility Analysis for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Conservative Treatment Versus Discectomy Versus Discectomy With Fusion. Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; GerĂ³nimo-Pardo M Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Jun; 32(5):E228-E234. PubMed ID: 30839420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]