BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24881636)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis in minimally invasive spine surgery.
    Al-Khouja LT; Baron EM; Johnson JP; Kim TT; Drazin D
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E4. PubMed ID: 24881636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is minimal access spine surgery more cost-effective than conventional spine surgery?
    Lubelski D; Mihalovich KE; Skelly AC; Fehlings MG; Harrop JS; Mummaneni PV; Wang MY; Steinmetz MP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S65-74. PubMed ID: 25299261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome.
    Ghogawala Z; Whitmore RG; Watters WC; Sharan A; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Groff MW; Wang JC; Resnick DK; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24980580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in cost calculations in spine surgery cost-effectiveness research.
    Alvin MD; Miller JA; Lubelski D; Rosenbaum BP; Abdullah KG; Whitmore RG; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E1. PubMed ID: 24881633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Comparing Open and Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery.
    Eseonu K; Oduoza U; Monem M; Tahir M
    Int J Spine Surg; 2022 Jul; 16(4):612-24. PubMed ID: 35835570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-utility analysis in spine care: a systematic review.
    Kepler CK; Wilkinson SM; Radcliff KE; Vaccaro AR; Anderson DG; Hilibrand AS; Albert TJ; Rihn JA
    Spine J; 2012 Aug; 12(8):676-90. PubMed ID: 22784806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry.
    Mummaneni PV; Whitmore RG; Curran JN; Ziewacz JE; Wadhwa R; Shaffrey CI; Asher AL; Heary RF; Cheng JS; Hurlbert RJ; Douglas AF; Smith JS; Malhotra NR; Dante SJ; Magge SN; Kaiser MG; Abbed KM; Resnick DK; Ghogawala Z
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E3. PubMed ID: 24881635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion.
    Passias PG; Brown AE; Alas H; Bortz CA; Pierce KE; Hassanzadeh H; Labaran LA; Puvanesarajah V; Vasquez-Montes D; Wang E; Ihejirika RC; Diebo BG; Lafage V; Lafage R; Sciubba DM; Janjua MB; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ; Gerling MC
    Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 33069859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
    Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unintended durotomy in lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: a 10-year systematic review of the literature.
    Ghobrial GM; Theofanis T; Darden BV; Arnold P; Fehlings MG; Harrop JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E8. PubMed ID: 26424348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Witham TF; Aaronson OS; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21506066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Aas E; Lydersen S; Andresen H; Rønning R; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):514-20. PubMed ID: 25608246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of cost drivers and cost variation for lumbar interbody fusion procedures using the Value Driven Outcomes database.
    Twitchell S; Karsy M; Reese J; Guan J; Couldwell WT; Dailey A; Bisson EF
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 May; 44(5):E10. PubMed ID: 29712516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cost effectiveness of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: a comparison of transpsoas and open techniques.
    Swamy G; Lopatina E; Thomas KC; Marshall DA; Johal HS
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 29859350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cost-minimization analysis in minimally invasive spine surgery using a national cost scale method.
    Maillard N; Buffenoir-Billet K; Hamel O; Lefranc B; Sellal O; Surer N; Bord E; Grimandi G; Clouet J
    Int J Surg; 2015 Mar; 15():68-73. PubMed ID: 25582298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.