These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24881672)

  • 21. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Generation of receptor structural ensembles for virtual screening using binding site shape analysis and clustering.
    Osguthorpe DJ; Sherman W; Hagler AT
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2012 Aug; 80(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 22515569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A flexible-protein molecular docking study of the binding of ruthenium complex compounds to PIM1, GSK-3β, and CDK2/Cyclin A protein kinases.
    Liu Y; Agrawal NJ; Radhakrishnan R
    J Mol Model; 2013 Jan; 19(1):371-82. PubMed ID: 22926267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE.
    Hoffer L; Renaud JP; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):836-51. PubMed ID: 23537132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of binding poses to FXR using multi-targeted docking combined with molecular dynamics and enhanced sampling.
    Bhakat S; Åberg E; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 29052792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. GeauxDock: A novel approach for mixed-resolution ligand docking using a descriptor-based force field.
    Ding Y; Fang Y; Feinstein WP; Ramanujam J; Koppelman DM; Moreno J; Brylinski M; Jarrell M
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(27):2013-26. PubMed ID: 26250822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes.
    Cavasotto CN; Kovacs JA; Abagyan RA
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jul; 127(26):9632-40. PubMed ID: 15984891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ensemble performance index: an improved measure for assessing ensemble pose prediction performance.
    Korb O; McCabe P; Cole J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2915-9. PubMed ID: 21962010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Choosing the Optimal Rigid Receptor for Docking and Scoring in the CSAR 2013/2014 Experiment.
    Baumgartner MP; Camacho CJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1004-12. PubMed ID: 26222931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling Binding with Large Conformational Changes: Key Points in Ensemble-Docking Approaches.
    Motta S; Bonati L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jul; 57(7):1563-1578. PubMed ID: 28616990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protein-ligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking.
    May A; Zacharias M
    J Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 51(12):3499-506. PubMed ID: 18517186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated docking for novel drug discovery.
    Bello M; Martínez-Archundia M; Correa-Basurto J
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2013 Jul; 8(7):821-34. PubMed ID: 23642085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic Docking Using Multicanonical Molecular Dynamics: Simulating Complex Formation at the Atomistic Level.
    Bekker GJ; Kamiya N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():187-202. PubMed ID: 33759128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.
    Davis IW; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 19041878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape.
    Basciu A; Malloci G; Pietrucci F; Bonvin AMJJ; Vargiu AV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 30883122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multi-conformer ensemble docking to difficult protein targets.
    Ellingson SR; Miao Y; Baudry J; Smith JC
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):1026-34. PubMed ID: 25198248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking.
    Smith GR; Sternberg MJ; Bates PA
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Apr; 347(5):1077-101. PubMed ID: 15784265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU.
    Santos-Martins D; Eberhardt J; Bianco G; Solis-Vasquez L; Ambrosio FA; Koch A; Forli S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1071-1081. PubMed ID: 31691920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.