These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24881672)

  • 41. Computational sampling of a cryptic drug binding site in a protein receptor: explicit solvent molecular dynamics and inhibitor docking to p38 MAP kinase.
    Frembgen-Kesner T; Elcock AH
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 359(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 16616932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An Effective Approach for Clustering InhA Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Using Substrate-Binding Cavity Features.
    De Paris R; Quevedo CV; Ruiz DD; Norberto de Souza O
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133172. PubMed ID: 26218832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Applying conformational selection theory to improve crossdocking efficiency in 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1.
    Kotasthane A; Mulakala C; Viswanadhan VN
    Proteins; 2014 Mar; 82(3):436-51. PubMed ID: 23999908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site.
    Wei BQ; Weaver LH; Ferrari AM; Matthews BW; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 337(5):1161-82. PubMed ID: 15046985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Improving the Accuracy of Protein-Ligand Binding Mode Prediction Using a Molecular Dynamics-Based Pocket Generation Approach.
    Araki M; Iwata H; Ma B; Fujita A; Terayama K; Sagae Y; Ono F; Tsuda K; Kamiya N; Okuno Y
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Dec; 39(32):2679-2689. PubMed ID: 30515903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Conformational selection of protein kinase A revealed by flexible-ligand flexible-protein docking.
    Huang Z; Wong CF
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Mar; 30(4):631-44. PubMed ID: 18711718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dynamic ligand-induced-fit simulation via enhanced conformational samplings and ensemble dockings: a survivin example.
    Park IH; Li C
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Apr; 114(15):5144-53. PubMed ID: 20337446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling.
    Xu M; Lill MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Mar; 51(3):693-706. PubMed ID: 21375306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking.
    Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prediction of ligand binding mode among multiple cross-docking poses by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu K; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Nov; 34(11):1195-1205. PubMed ID: 32869148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free energy perturbation calculations.
    Guimarães CR; Mathiowetz AM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 20235592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
    Wu Y; Brooks CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU.
    Santos-Martins D; Eberhardt J; Bianco G; Solis-Vasquez L; Ambrosio FA; Koch A; Forli S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1071-1081. PubMed ID: 31691920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design.
    Antunes DA; Devaurs D; Kavraki LE
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1301-13. PubMed ID: 26414598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.
    Lindström A; Edvinsson L; Johansson A; Andersson CD; Andersson IE; Raubacher F; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 21309544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Arcon JP; Turjanski AG; Martí MA; Forli S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():39-72. PubMed ID: 33759120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis.
    Venkatraman V; Ritchie DW
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(9):2262-74. PubMed ID: 22610423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols.
    Osguthorpe DJ; Sherman W; Hagler AT
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Jun; 116(23):6952-9. PubMed ID: 22424156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.