These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24884361)

  • 21. Egg Viability, Mating Frequency and Male Mating Ability Evolve in Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Selected for Resistance to Cold Shock.
    Singh K; Kochar E; Prasad NG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129992. PubMed ID: 26065704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lev A; Pischedda A
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 37534751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experience matters: genetic variation affects male reproductive success across sequential mating events in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Fiumera AC
    J Evol Biol; 2024 May; 37(5):501-509. PubMed ID: 38513113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Female mating experience and genetic background independently influence male mating success in fruit flies.
    Filice DCS; Bhargava R; Dukas R
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Feb; 34(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 33128417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pitnick S; García-González F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Sep; 269(1502):1821-8. PubMed ID: 12350270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lefranc A; Bundgaard J
    Hereditas; 2000; 132(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 11075519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The deleterious effects of high inbreeding on male Drosophila melanogaster attractiveness are observed under competitive but not under non-competitive conditions.
    Valtonen TM; Roff DA; Rantala MJ
    Behav Genet; 2014 Mar; 44(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 24413901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female Life-History Trade-Offs and the Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D
    Am Nat; 2018 Oct; 192(4):448-460. PubMed ID: 30205025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic variation but weak genetic covariation between pre- and post-copulatory episodes of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Travers LM; Garcia-Gonzalez F; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1535-52. PubMed ID: 27159063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mating increases Drosophila melanogaster females' choosiness by reducing olfactory sensitivity to a male pheromone.
    Kohlmeier P; Zhang Y; Gorter JA; Su CY; Billeter JC
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2021 Aug; 5(8):1165-1173. PubMed ID: 34155384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.
    Anholt RRH; O'Grady P; Wolfner MF; Harbison ST
    Genetics; 2020 Jan; 214(1):49-73. PubMed ID: 31907301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Female influence on pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection and its genetic basis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Giardina TJ; Beavis A; Clark AG; Fiumera AC
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Oct; 20(19):4098-108. PubMed ID: 21902747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A test of genetic models for the evolutionary maintenance of same-sex sexual behaviour.
    Hoskins JL; Ritchie MG; Bailey NW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1809):20150429. PubMed ID: 26019160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraspecific variation in the effects of mating on emigration activity and fecundity in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Mikasa K
    Genes Genet Syst; 1998 Aug; 73(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 9880924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experimental evolution of female traits under different levels of intersexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Nandy B; Gupta V; Udaykumar N; Samant MA; Sen S; Prasad NG
    Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):412-25. PubMed ID: 24117169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Male × female interaction for a pre-copulatory trait, but not a post-copulatory trait, among cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Little MK
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e31683. PubMed ID: 22431964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Males Become Choosier in Response to Manipulations of Female Wing Ornaments in Dry Season Bicyclus anynana Butterflies.
    Ng SY; Bhardwaj S; Monteiro A
    J Insect Sci; 2017 Jul; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28973485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Divergent selection on behavioural and chemical traits between reproductively isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Jin B; Barbash DA; Castillo DM
    J Evol Biol; 2022 May; 35(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 35411988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.