These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24884361)

  • 41. Sexual selection and the nonrandom union of gametes: retesting for assortative mating by fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Talagala S; Rakosy E; Long TAF
    Evolution; 2024 Jan; 78(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 37875133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The consequences of genetic variation in sex peptide expression levels for egg laying and retention in females.
    Smith DT; Sirot LK; Wolfner MF; Hosken DJ; Wedell N
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Oct; 109(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 22692269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Experimental evolution of a novel sexually antagonistic allele.
    Dean R; Perry JC; Pizzari T; Mank JE; Wigby S
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(8):e1002917. PubMed ID: 22956914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict.
    Lew TA; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16568635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reproductive behaviour evolves rapidly when intralocus sexual conflict is removed.
    Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Jiang PP; Chippindale AK
    PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2187. PubMed ID: 18478127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intraspecific Genetic Variation for Lead-Induced Changes in Reproductive Strategies.
    Peterson EK; Possidente B; Stark A; Hollocher KT; Carrico P
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2019 Aug; 103(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 31230133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Phenotypic plasticity in female mate choice behavior is mediated by an interaction of direct and indirect genetic effects in
    Filice DCS; Long TAF
    Ecol Evol; 2017 May; 7(10):3542-3551. PubMed ID: 28515889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of
    Lund-Hansen KK; Olito C; Morrow EH; Abbott JK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33602805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sexual experience enhances Drosophila melanogaster male mating behavior and success.
    Saleem S; Ruggles PH; Abbott WK; Carney GE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96639. PubMed ID: 24805129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Roles of Female and Male Genotype in Post-Mating Responses in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Delbare SYN; Chow CY; Wolfner MF; Clark AG
    J Hered; 2017 Oct; 108(7):740-753. PubMed ID: 29036644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Natural genetic variation in complex mating behaviors of male Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ruedi EA; Hughes KA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 18369720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Male Drosophila melanogaster show adaptive mating bias in response to female infection status.
    Khan I; Prasad NG
    J Insect Physiol; 2013 Oct; 59(10):1017-23. PubMed ID: 23932964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Genetic conflict between sexual signalling and juvenile survival in the three-spined stickleback.
    Kim SY; Velando A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Feb; 16():52. PubMed ID: 26924796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Male attractiveness is subjective to exposure to males of different attractiveness in fruit flies.
    Poissonnier LA; Danchin E; Isabel G
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16463. PubMed ID: 39014083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Direct benefits of choosing a high-fitness mate can offset the indirect costs associated with intralocus sexual conflict.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale AK
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1710-1718. PubMed ID: 28369895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The timing of mating influences reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster: implications for sexual conflict.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Nichols RV; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2010 May; 23(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20345814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
    Byrne PG; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Apr; 273(1589):917-22. PubMed ID: 16627276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sexual conflict and cooperation in butterfly reproduction: a comparative study of polyandry and female fitness.
    Wiklund C; Karlsson B; Leimar O
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Aug; 268(1477):1661-7. PubMed ID: 11506678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.