These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24884389)

  • 1. Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.
    Bryant DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24884389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When one cue is not enough: combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U; Dieckmann A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1197-215. PubMed ID: 17676553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satisficing in split-second decision making is characterized by strategic cue discounting.
    Oh H; Beck JM; Zhu P; Sommer MA; Ferrari S; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1937-1956. PubMed ID: 27253846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making.
    Richter T; Späth P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 16478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making.
    Yang CT; Little DR; Hsu CC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2256-75. PubMed ID: 24939235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why does cue polarity information provide benefits in inference problems? The role of strategy selection and knowledge of cue importance.
    von Helversen B; Karlsson L; Mata R; Wilke A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 23770569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term serial position effects in cue-based inference.
    Lawrence A; Thomas R; Dougherty M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200821. PubMed ID: 30021017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the relative weights of visual and auditory tau versus heuristic-based cues for time-to-contact judgments in realistic, familiar scenes by older and younger adults.
    Keshavarz B; Campos JL; DeLucia PR; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):929-944. PubMed ID: 28097504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use.
    Pachur T; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to choose: Cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making.
    Mata R; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Jun; 25(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 20545415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The electrophysiological correlate of saliency: evidence from a figure-detection task.
    Straube S; Fahle M
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():89-102. PubMed ID: 19854163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simply criminal: predicting burglars' occupancy decisions with a simple heuristic.
    Snook B; Dhami MK; Kavanagh JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):316-26. PubMed ID: 20556493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():167-84. PubMed ID: 26687019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.