These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24884476)

  • 1. Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.
    Klinich KD; Reed MP; Ebert SM; Rupp JD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 24884476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved positioning procedures for 6YO and 10YO ATDs based on child occupant postures.
    Reed MP; Ebert-Hamilton SM; Manary MA; Klinich KD; Schneider LW
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2006 Nov; 50():337-88. PubMed ID: 17311170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of vehicle seat and belt geometry on belt fit for children with and without belt positioning booster seats.
    Reed MP; Ebert-Hamilton SM; Klinich KD; Manary MA; Rupp JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():512-22. PubMed ID: 22703990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seat belt pre-pretensioner effect on child-sized dummies during run-off-road events.
    Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S96-S102. PubMed ID: 28402687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
    Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of naturalistic seating postures and seatbelt routing on booster-seated Q6 ATD kinematics and kinetics in frontal impacts.
    Maheshwari J; Griffith M; Baker G; Patton D; Mansfield J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 189():107140. PubMed ID: 37263046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematics and shoulder belt position of child anthropomorphic test devices during steering maneuvers.
    Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 24073767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of pediatric ATD biofidelity as compared to child volunteers in low-speed far-side oblique and lateral impacts.
    Seacrist T; Locey CM; Mathews EA; Jones DL; Balasubramanian S; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S206-14. PubMed ID: 25307388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts.
    Bohman K; Östh J; Jakobsson L; Stockman I; Wimmerstedt M; Wallin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S25-S30. PubMed ID: 32816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kinematics of child volunteers and child anthropomorphic test devices during emergency braking events in real car environment.
    Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L; Brolin K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 23259524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts - with and without automatic emergency braking.
    Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Falciani C; Belwadi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S49-S53. PubMed ID: 33095067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frontal and oblique crash tests of HIII 6-year-old child ATD using real-world, observed child passenger postures.
    Bohman K; Arbogast KB; Loeb H; Charlton JL; Koppel S; Cross SL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S125-S130. PubMed ID: 29584494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pretensioner loading to rear-seat occupants during static and dynamic testing.
    Bohman K; Fredriksson R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S111-8. PubMed ID: 25307375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of personal protection equipment, occupant body size, and restraint system on the frontal impact responses of Hybrid III ATDs in tactical vehicles.
    Zaseck LW; Orton NR; Gruber R; Rupp J; Scherer R; Reed M; Hu J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):642-649. PubMed ID: 28095025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frontal crash seat belt restraint effectiveness and comfort accessories used by older occupants.
    Whyte T; Kent N; Keay L; Coxon K; Brown J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 31815527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scaling approach in predicting the seatbelt loading and kinematics of vulnerable occupants: How far can we go?
    Nie B; Forman JL; Joodaki H; Wu T; Kent RW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():93-100. PubMed ID: 27586109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of vehicle and restraint design changes for mitigating rear seat occupant injuries.
    Beck B; Brown J; Bilston LE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):711-9. PubMed ID: 24279923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rebound after rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 23343027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.