These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24885434)

  • 1. Could digital patient communities be the launch pad for patient-centric trial design?
    Wicks P
    Trials; 2014 May; 15():172. PubMed ID: 24885434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The information needs of people living with ankylosing spondylitis: a questionnaire survey.
    Cooksey R; Brophy S; Husain MJ; Irvine E; Davies H; Siebert S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Dec; 13():243. PubMed ID: 23227937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of patient knowledge on rheumatoid arthritis in the range of their own disease--preliminary study.
    Pytel A; Wrzosek Z
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2012; 21(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 23214198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.
    Hillyer GC; Beauchemin M; Hershman DL; Kelsen M; Brogan FL; Sandoval R; Schmitt KM; Reyes A; Terry MB; Lassman AB; Schwartz GK
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 32009456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scope, Themes, and Medical Accuracy of eHealth Peripheral Artery Disease Community Forums.
    Castaneda P; Sales A; Osborne NH; Corriere MA
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 54():92-102. PubMed ID: 30267913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nocebo side-effects in cancer treatment.
    Garg AK
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Dec; 12(13):1181-2. PubMed ID: 21944597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer access to health care information: its effect on the physician-patient relationship.
    Jacob J
    Alaska Med; 2002; 44(4):75-82. PubMed ID: 12650084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guiding principles for printed education materials: design preferences of people with aphasia.
    Rose TA; Worrall LE; Hickson LM; Hoffmann TC
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Feb; 14(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 22136650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies.
    Haywood K; Marshall S; Fitzpatrick R
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):12-23. PubMed ID: 16406464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of patient feedback as an educational intervention to improve medical student consultation (PTA Feedback Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Lai MM; Roberts N; Martin J
    Trials; 2014 Sep; 15():361. PubMed ID: 25227174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lupus patient decisions about clinical trial participation: a qualitative evaluation of perceptions, facilitators and barriers.
    Arriens C; Aberle T; Carthen F; Kamp S; Thanou A; Chakravarty E; James JA; Merrill JT; Ogunsanya ME
    Lupus Sci Med; 2020; 7(1):e000360. PubMed ID: 32201595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.
    Stepan KA; Gonzalez AP; Dorsey VS; Frye DK; Pyle ND; Smith RF; Throckmorton TA; Villejo LA; Cantor SB
    J Cancer Educ; 2011 Mar; 26(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 20862574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How a simple 'thank you' could improve clinical trials.
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7731):293-294. PubMed ID: 30425370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical Misinformation: Vet the Message!
    Hill JA; Agewall S; Baranchuk A; Booz GW; Borer JS; Camici PG; Chen PS; Dominiczak AF; Erol Ç; Grines CL; Gropler R; Guzik TJ; Heinemann MK; Iskandrian AE; Knight BP; London B; Lüscher TF; Metra M; Musunuru K; Nallamothu BK; Natale A; Saksena S; Picard MH; Rao SV; Remme WJ; Rosenson RS; Sweitzer NK; Timmis A; Vrints C
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2019 Feb; 73(2):61-62. PubMed ID: 30730472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics and information searched for by French patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A web-community data-driven online survey.
    Meunier B; Jourde-Chiche N; Mancini J; Chekroun M; Retornaz F; Chiche L
    Lupus; 2016 Apr; 25(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 26454067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding decision and enabling factors influencing clinical trial participation in Australia: a view point.
    McMahon VA; Matthews S; Capper H; Chudleigh JB; McLachlan CS
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3153-6. PubMed ID: 22394007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Oncology Clinical Trial Participation and Experience.
    Zaharoff B; Cipra S
    Trends Cancer; 2018 Dec; 4(12):793-796. PubMed ID: 30470299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Financial Concerns About Participation in Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer.
    Wong YN; Schluchter MD; Albrecht TL; Benson AB; Buzaglo J; Collins M; Flamm AL; Fleisher L; Katz M; Kinzy TG; Liu TM; Manne S; Margevicius S; Miller DM; Miller SM; Poole D; Raivitch S; Roach N; Ross E; Meropol NJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 34(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 26700120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research information knowledge, perceived adequacy, and understanding in cancer clinical trial participants.
    Biedrzycki BA
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Jul; 38(4):E291-6. PubMed ID: 21708524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community.
    DasMahapatra P; Raja P; Gilbert J; Wicks P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Feb; 17(1):166. PubMed ID: 28241758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.