212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24885893)
1. Efficient clinical evaluation of guideline quality: development and testing of a new tool.
Grimmer K; Dizon JM; Milanese S; King E; Beaton K; Thorpe O; Lizarondo L; Luker J; Machotka Z; Kumar S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():63. PubMed ID: 24885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. South African clinical practice guidelines quality measured with complex and rapid appraisal instruments.
Grimmer K; Machingaidze S; Dizon J; Kredo T; Louw Q; Young T
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():244. PubMed ID: 27121107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of clinical practice guideline quality: comparison of two appraisal tools.
Koc EM; Aksoy H; Ayhan Baser D; Baydar Artantas A; Kahveci R; Cihan FG
Int J Qual Health Care; 2020 Dec; 32(10):663-670. PubMed ID: 33057630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation and reliability of a guideline appraisal mini-checklist for daily practice use.
Siebenhofer A; Semlitsch T; Herborn T; Siering U; Kopp I; Hartig J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():39. PubMed ID: 27039299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel method of rapid appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for children with enuresis.
Trajanovska M; King S; Goldfeld S; Gibb S
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Aug; 15(4):333.e1-333.e9. PubMed ID: 31217085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.
Sabharwal S; Patel NK; Gauher S; Holloway I; Athanasiou T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1982-8. PubMed ID: 24566890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the quality of clinical practice guidelines for lymphedema, as assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
O'Donnell TF; Allison GM; Melikian R; Iafrati MD
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2020 Jul; 8(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 32335331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: a clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument.
Yan J; Min J; Zhou B
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 22809219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Zeng M; Yi Q; Zeng L; Chen Z; Mi X; Song H; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang Q; Zhao R; Miao L; Zhang L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():47-58. PubMed ID: 31678686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An independent AGREE evaluation of the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.
Cates JR; Young DN; Bowerman DS; Porter RC
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 16413451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applicability of the AGREE II instrument in evaluating the development process and quality of current National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry guidelines.
Don-Wauchope AC; Sievenpiper JL; Hill SA; Iorio A
Clin Chem; 2012 Oct; 58(10):1426-37. PubMed ID: 22879395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appraisal of International Guidelines on Smoking Cessation using the AGREE II Assessment Tool.
Quintyne KI; Kavanagh P
Ir Med J; 2019 Feb; 112(2):867. PubMed ID: 30892001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the practice guidelines of Finnish Institute of Occupational Health with AGREE instrument.
Kinnunen-Amoroso M; Pasternack I; Mattila S; Parantainen A
Ind Health; 2009 Dec; 47(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 19996548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation.
Radwan M; Akbari Sari A; Rashidian A; Takian A; Abou-Dagga S; Elsous A
JRSM Open; 2017 Feb; 8(2):2054270416682673. PubMed ID: 28203385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating clinical practice guidelines developed for the management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancers and assessing the reliability and validity of the AGREE instrument.
Irani S; Rashidian A; Yousefi-Nooraie R; Soltani A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Aug; 17(4):729-36. PubMed ID: 21223456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A critical appraisal of the North American Spine Society guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Yaman ME; Gudeloglu A; Senturk S; Yaman ND; Tolunay T; Ozturk Y; Arslan AK
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 25614152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of type 2 diabetes using non-insulin glucose-lowering therapies: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument.
Lam WMJ; Al-Khalifah R; Florez ID; Cruz-Lopes L; Sekercioglu MF; Couban R; Fu R; Cherney DZI; Sekercioglu N
Diabet Med; 2020 Apr; 37(4):636-647. PubMed ID: 31943344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.
AGREE Collaboration
Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Feb; 12(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12571340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions: appraisal instrument.
Antoniou SA; Florez ID; Markar S; Logullo P; López-Cano M; Silecchia G; Antoniou GA; Tsokani S; Mavridis D; Brouwers M;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5547-5558. PubMed ID: 35705753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council's clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy.
Gyawali R; Toomey M; Stapleton F; Zangerl B; Dillon L; Keay L; Liew G; Jalbert I
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Nov; 104(8):864-870. PubMed ID: 33689646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
