These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24886043)
1. Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study. Smaïl-Faugeron V; Fron-Chabouis H; Courson F; Durieux P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():64. PubMed ID: 24886043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward. Alexander PE; Bonner AJ; Agarwal A; Li SA; Hariharan A; Izhar Z; Bhatnagar N; Alba C; Akl EA; Fei Y; Guyatt GH; Beyene J J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 26597972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study. Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study. Dugard A; Tavernier E; Caille A; Dechartres A; Hoang A; Giraudeau B; Dibao-Dina C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):329. PubMed ID: 36550405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study. Tsujimoto Y; Fujii T; Onishi A; Omae K; Luo Y; Imai H; Takahashi S; Itaya T; Pinson C; Nevitt SJ; Furukawa TA J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():107-114.e5. PubMed ID: 31654789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study. Bröckelmann N; Balduzzi S; Harms L; Beyerbach J; Petropoulou M; Kubiak C; Wolkewitz M; Meerpohl JJ; Schwingshackl L BMC Med; 2022 May; 20(1):174. PubMed ID: 35538478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for pharmacological randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults only and those including adults: a meta-epidemiological study. Seegers V; Trinquart L; Boutron I; Ravaud P PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63677. PubMed ID: 23723992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study. Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; Flores-Mir C BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004527. PubMed ID: 24568962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence regarding lingual fixed orthodontic appliances' therapeutic and adverse effects is insufficient. Afrashtehfar KI Evid Based Dent; 2016 Jun; 17(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 27339241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intervention effect estimates in cluster randomized versus individually randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study. Leyrat C; Caille A; Eldridge S; Kerry S; Dechartres A; Giraudeau B Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):609-619. PubMed ID: 30418549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analyses frequently include old trials that are associated with a larger intervention effect: a meta-epidemiological study. Smail-Faugeron V; Tan A; Caille A; Yordanov Y; Hajage D; Tubach F; Martin G; Dechartres A J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 May; 145():144-153. PubMed ID: 35131467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study. Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C J Dent Res; 2018 Jan; 97(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28813182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence from crossover trials: empirical evaluation and comparison against parallel arm trials. Lathyris DN; Trikalinos TA; Ioannidis JP Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 36(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 17301102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aspirin for prophylactic use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and overview of reviews. Sutcliffe P; Connock M; Gurung T; Freeman K; Johnson S; Kandala NB; Grove A; Gurung B; Morrow S; Clarke A Health Technol Assess; 2013 Sep; 17(43):1-253. PubMed ID: 24074752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analyses frequently pooled different study types together: a meta-epidemiological study. Bun RS; Scheer J; Guillo S; Tubach F; Dechartres A J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():18-28. PubMed ID: 31698062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Mishra SI; Scherer RW; Geigle PM; Berlanstein DR; Topaloglu O; Gotay CC; Snyder C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Aug; 2012(8):CD007566. PubMed ID: 22895961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Airway clearance devices for cystic fibrosis: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(26):1-50. PubMed ID: 23074531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Lonjon G; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Ahmad N; Aim F; Nizard R; Ravaud P Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24096758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]