These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24886990)

  • 1. A 10-second fluid challenge guided by transthoracic echocardiography can predict fluid responsiveness.
    Wu Y; Zhou S; Zhou Z; Liu B
    Crit Care; 2014 May; 18(3):R108. PubMed ID: 24886990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ability of pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
    Hasanin A; Karam N; Mukhtar AM; Habib SF
    J Anesth; 2021 Apr; 35(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 33616758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical evaluation of transthoracic echocardiography predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock].
    Wu J; Zhang X; Wang Z; Liu B; Jiang X; Lu W; Jin X; Wang X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Jan; 26(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 24506854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Passive leg raising combined with echocardiography could evaluate volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Hu X; Li L; Hao X; Niu N; Tang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 May; 31(5):619-622. PubMed ID: 31198151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
    Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
    Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
    Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].
    Xiang S; Muyun H; Juan C; Bin O; Minying C; Changjie C; Jianfeng W; Zimeng L; Yongjun L; Shunwei H; Lifen L; Xiangdong G
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Sep; 27(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 26955698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine learning methods to improve bedside fluid responsiveness prediction in severe sepsis or septic shock: an observational study.
    Bataille B; de Selle J; Moussot PE; Marty P; Silva S; Cocquet P
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Apr; 126(4):826-834. PubMed ID: 33461735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Measurement of brachial artery velocity variation and inferior vena cava variability to estimate fluid responsiveness].
    Zhu W; Wan L; Wan X; Wang G; Su M; Liao G; Huang Q
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 28(8):713-7. PubMed ID: 27434562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Accuracy of Velocity-Time Integral Variation and Peak Velocity Variation of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Patients Mechanically Ventilated at Low Tidal Volumes.
    Xie J; Wan J; Xu L; Zhang Y; Chen J
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2023 Jun; 37(6):911-918. PubMed ID: 36931906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study.
    Roger C; Zieleskiewicz L; Demattei C; Lakhal K; Piton G; Louart B; Constantin JM; Chabanne R; Faure JS; Mahjoub Y; Desmeulles I; Quintard H; Lefrant JY; Muller L;
    Crit Care; 2019 May; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 31097012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-expiratory occlusion maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in the intensive care unit: an echocardiographic study.
    Georges D; de Courson H; Lanchon R; Sesay M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Biais M
    Crit Care; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32. PubMed ID: 29415773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters.
    Charbonneau H; Riu B; Faron M; Mari A; Kurrek MM; Ruiz J; Geeraerts T; Fourcade O; Genestal M; Silva S
    Crit Care; 2014 Sep; 18(5):473. PubMed ID: 25189403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis.
    Theerawit P; Morasert T; Sutherasan Y
    J Crit Care; 2016 Dec; 36():246-251. PubMed ID: 27591389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Predictive value of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference for fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a prospective clinical study].
    Liu G; Huang H; Qin H; Du B
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 May; 30(5):449-455. PubMed ID: 29764550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effective arterial elastance in evaluating the fluid challenge in septic shock patients].
    Yang T; Huang H; Weng L; Du B
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2021 Mar; 33(3):269-275. PubMed ID: 33834966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulse Wave Transit Time Measurements of Cardiac Output in Septic Shock Patients: A Comparison of the Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output System with Transthoracic Echocardiography.
    Feissel M; Aho LS; Georgiev S; Tapponnier R; Badie J; Bruyère R; Quenot JP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130489. PubMed ID: 26126112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral at Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.
    Zhou G; Zhang H; Wang X; Liu D
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(8 Pt B):3101-3108. PubMed ID: 35599102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.