161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24887443)
1. Single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology: outcomes and feasibility.
Figurelli J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Katdare N; Coulon P; Fournier C; Leblanc E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 24887443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim SW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):935-42. PubMed ID: 23694984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Feasibility study about the single-port in gynecologic oncology surgery].
Heinemann M; Cannone F; Lambaudie E; Michel V; Buttarelli M; Bannier M; Houvenaghel G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Sep; 41(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 22633038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22410390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes.
Lee YY; Kim TJ; Kim CJ; Park HS; Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee JH; Bae DS; Kim BG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Aug; 151(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 20392556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology for Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients.
Peng J; Sinasac S; Pulman KJ; Zhang L; Murphy J; Feigenberg T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 29727349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative Outcomes after Single-port Laparoscopic Removal of Adnexal Masses in Patients Referred to Gynecologic Oncology at a Large Academic Center.
Moulton LJ; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 28673874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
Kim TJ; Lee YY; Kim MJ; Kim CJ; Kang H; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 19835804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign salpingo-ovarian pathology: a single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.
Al-Badawi IA; AlOmar O; Albadawi N; Abu-Zaid A
Ann Saudi Med; 2016; 36(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26809202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) - is it feasible in gynecological surgery?
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Luedders D; Diedrich K; Bohlmann MK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Feb; 90(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 21241267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-port-access, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign large adnexal tumors versus single-port pure laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors.
Roh HJ; Lee SJ; Ahn JW; Kwon YS; Cho HJ; Kim DY
Surg Endosc; 2012 Mar; 26(3):693-703. PubMed ID: 22038160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single access laparoscopy for adnexal pathologies using a novel reusable port and curved instruments.
Mereu L; Angioni S; Melis GB; Mencaglia L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Apr; 109(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 20070967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and feasibility of a single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery during pregnancy.
Lee JH; Lee JR; Jee BC; Suh CS; Kim SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):864-70. PubMed ID: 23850362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Schmitt A; Crochet P; Knight S; Tourette C; Loundou A; Agostini A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1083-1095. PubMed ID: 28705751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal diseases: a pilot study.
Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Marocco F; Rossitto C; Gallotta V; Marana E; Scambia G
Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20872020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
