These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24888277)

  • 1. Randomised controlled trials: the long hard climb to the summit-is there another way in the 21st century?
    Dulhunty JM; Starr T; Bellomo R; Lipman J
    Crit Care Resusc; 2014 Jun; 16(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 24888277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised studies--useful for whom?
    Hjelmesæth J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2014 Oct; 134(19):1819. PubMed ID: 25314972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observational studies: why are they so important?
    Mariani AW; Pêgo-Fernandes PM
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24474072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomised controlled trials: on the way out?
    Munshi A
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Jun; 21(5):427-8. PubMed ID: 19269143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of randomised controlled trials in urology.
    Dahm P; N'Dow J; Holmberg L; Hamdy F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24495465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled trials and 21st century epistemology.
    Grannis FW
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2012 Aug; 10(8):926-7. PubMed ID: 22878816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of randomised controlled trials: quality of research may be worse than it appears.
    Vlassov VV
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7434):286. PubMed ID: 14751906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of randomised controlled trials: caution is important.
    Brewer NJ
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7434):286-7. PubMed ID: 14751905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of randomised controlled trials may be better than assumed.
    del Giglio A; Costa LJ
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7430):24-5. PubMed ID: 14703541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials.
    Edwards SJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Jackson JC; Hewison J; Thornton J
    Health Technol Assess; 1998 Dec; 2(15):i-vi, 1-132. PubMed ID: 10194615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trial design in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Johnson PJ; Billingham LJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Feb; 19(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 15757808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
    Otwombe KN; Ogutu B
    East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consort 2010 statement on randomised controlled trials.
    Murphy JF
    Ir Med J; 2010 May; 103(5):132. PubMed ID: 20666080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
    Nelson EA
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of randomised controlled trials: quality of trial methods is not good in all disciplines.
    Handoll HH
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7434):286. PubMed ID: 14751907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery.
    Carney S
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):376. PubMed ID: 18063433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials.
    Prescott RJ; Counsell CE; Gillespie WJ; Grant AM; Russell IT; Kiauka S; Colthart IR; Ross S; Shepherd SM; Russell D
    Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(20):1-143. PubMed ID: 10683591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of observational studies in understanding regional clinical practice: rationale and design of the A1chieve study.
    Sahay BK; Seshiah V
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2013 Jan; 61(1 Suppl):6-8. PubMed ID: 24482979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trials in the 21st century: a global approach.
    Chadwick GL
    Res Nurs Health; 2001 Dec; 24(6):541-2. PubMed ID: 11746083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.