These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2488956)

  • 21. [The new magnets for dental prostheses].
    Pirnay L
    Cah Prothese; 1989 Mar; (65):62-71. PubMed ID: 2699827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retentive forces of two magnetic systems compared with two precision attachments.
    Saygili G; Sahmali S
    J Oral Sci; 1998 Jun; 40(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 9680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Development and transition of magnetic attachments--a literature review].
    Hirata M
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Dec; 64(4):544-56. PubMed ID: 9483897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retentive characteristics of different magnetic systems for dental applications.
    Highton R; Caputo AA; Pezzoli M; Matyas J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 3522871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
    Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
    Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Studies on the Sm-Co magnet as a dental material.
    Tsutsui H; Kinouchi Y; Sasaki H; Shiota M; Ushita T
    J Dent Res; 1979 Jun; 58(6):1597-1606. PubMed ID: 376568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The extent of maintenance required by implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year report.
    Davis DM; Rogers JO; Packer ME
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):767-74. PubMed ID: 8990639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rare earth magnetic attachments: the state of the art in removable prosthodontics.
    Jackson TR; Healey KW
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Jan; 18(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 3547453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application of cast magnetic attachments to sectional complete dentures for a patient with microstomia: a clinical report.
    Watanabe I; Tanaka Y; Ohkubo C; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 12488848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of the surface characteristics, microstructure, and magnetic retentive forces of laser-welded dowel-keepers and cast dowel-keepers for use with magnetic attachments.
    Chao Y; Du L; Yang L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15867758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retentive characteristics of different dental magnetic systems.
    Akaltan F; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 8531164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cured case, removing a metallic foreign body in the brain by Pt-Co magnet].
    Suzuki J; Kurashima Y; Homma M
    No To Shinkei; 1968 Jun; 20(6):629-32. PubMed ID: 5755061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in vitro comparison of retentive force and deformation of acetal resin and cobalt-chromium clasps.
    Arda T; Arikan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 16126079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results.
    Davis DM; Packer ME
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.