These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

884 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24890422)

  • 21. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. False-positive EUS-guided FNA cytology for solid pancreatic lesions.
    Siddiqui AA; Kowalski TE; Shahid H; O'Donnell S; Tolin J; Loren DE; Infantolino A; Hong SK; Eloubeidi MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 21737075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
    Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
    Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
    Iwashita T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Uemura S; Mabuchi M; Shimizu M; Hatano Y; Hara A; Moriwaki H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized trial comparing a side-port needle and standard needle for EUS-guided histology of pancreatic lesions.
    Ishiwatari H; Hayashi T; Kawakami H; Isayama H; Hisai H; Itoi T; Ono M; Kawakubo K; Yamamoto N; Tanaka M; Itokawa F; Oshiro H; Sonoda T; Hasegawa T;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):670-8. PubMed ID: 26995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 22-gauge core
    Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification.
    Unno J; Kanno A; Masamune A; Kasajima A; Fujishima F; Ishida K; Hamada S; Kume K; Kikuta K; Hirota M; Motoi F; Unno M; Shimosegawa T
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25180490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses.
    Lee JK; Choi JH; Lee KH; Kim KM; Shin JU; Lee JK; Lee KT; Jang KT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 May; 77(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 23433878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pretest prediction and diagnosis of metastatic lesions to the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
    Krishna SG; Bhattacharya A; Ross WA; Ladha H; Porter K; Bhutani MS; Lee JH
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1552-60. PubMed ID: 25867963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing EUS Sonopsy CY(R) and 22-gauge Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Mizukawa S; Kato H; Muro S; Akimoto Y; Uchida D; Tomoda T; Matsumoto K; Yamamoto N; Horiguchi S; Tsutsumi K; Okada H; Inoue H; Tanaka N
    Acta Med Okayama; 2016 Oct; 70(5):417-420. PubMed ID: 27777439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.