876 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24890422)
21. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. False-positive EUS-guided FNA cytology for solid pancreatic lesions.
Siddiqui AA; Kowalski TE; Shahid H; O'Donnell S; Tolin J; Loren DE; Infantolino A; Hong SK; Eloubeidi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 21737075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
Iwashita T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Uemura S; Mabuchi M; Shimizu M; Hatano Y; Hara A; Moriwaki H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Randomized trial comparing a side-port needle and standard needle for EUS-guided histology of pancreatic lesions.
Ishiwatari H; Hayashi T; Kawakami H; Isayama H; Hisai H; Itoi T; Ono M; Kawakubo K; Yamamoto N; Tanaka M; Itokawa F; Oshiro H; Sonoda T; Hasegawa T;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):670-8. PubMed ID: 26995688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification.
Unno J; Kanno A; Masamune A; Kasajima A; Fujishima F; Ishida K; Hamada S; Kume K; Kikuta K; Hirota M; Motoi F; Unno M; Shimosegawa T
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25180490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses.
Lee JK; Choi JH; Lee KH; Kim KM; Shin JU; Lee JK; Lee KT; Jang KT
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 May; 77(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 23433878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pretest prediction and diagnosis of metastatic lesions to the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
Krishna SG; Bhattacharya A; Ross WA; Ladha H; Porter K; Bhutani MS; Lee JH
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1552-60. PubMed ID: 25867963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing EUS Sonopsy CY(R) and 22-gauge Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
Mizukawa S; Kato H; Muro S; Akimoto Y; Uchida D; Tomoda T; Matsumoto K; Yamamoto N; Horiguchi S; Tsutsumi K; Okada H; Inoue H; Tanaka N
Acta Med Okayama; 2016 Oct; 70(5):417-420. PubMed ID: 27777439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
