These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24890644)

  • 1. A hierarchical Bayesian model averaging framework for groundwater prediction under uncertainty.
    Chitsazan N; Tsai FT
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(2):305-16. PubMed ID: 24890644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian Chance-Constrained Hydraulic Barrier Design under Geological Structure Uncertainty.
    Chitsazan N; Pham HV; Tsai FT
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(6):908-19. PubMed ID: 25510348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty-based saltwater intrusion prediction using integrated Bayesian machine learning modeling (IBMLM) in a deep aquifer.
    Yin J; Huang Y; Lu C; Liu Z
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Mar; 354():120252. PubMed ID: 38394869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty analysis of coupling multiple hydrologic models and multiple objective functions in Han River, China.
    Dong L; Xiong L; Zheng Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 23925176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.
    Ye M; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Pohll GM; Reeves DM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 19788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of uncertainties in groundwater vulnerability modelling using Bayesian model averaging (BMA).
    Gharekhani M; Nadiri AA; Khatibi R; Sadeghfam S; Asghari Moghaddam A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114168. PubMed ID: 34894494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian machine learning ensemble approach to quantify model uncertainty in predicting groundwater storage change.
    Yin J; Medellín-Azuara J; Escriva-Bou A; Liu Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 769():144715. PubMed ID: 33736244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parameter Estimation for Groundwater Models under Uncertain Irrigation Data.
    Demissie Y; Valocchi A; Cai X; Brozovic N; Senay G; Gebremichael M
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):614-25. PubMed ID: 25040235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty analysis of a groundwater flow model in East-central Florida.
    Sepúlveda N; Doherty J
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):464-74. PubMed ID: 25040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model averaging techniques for quantifying conceptual model uncertainty.
    Singh A; Mishra S; Ruskauff G
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 19878329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient Calibration/Uncertainty Analysis Using Paired Complex/Surrogate Models.
    Burrows W; Doherty J
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):531-41. PubMed ID: 25142272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for variation in rainfall intensity and surface slope in wash-off model calibration and prediction within the Bayesian framework.
    Muthusamy M; Wani O; Schellart A; Tait S
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():561-569. PubMed ID: 30007259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complexity vs. simplicity: groundwater model ranking using information criteria.
    Engelhardt I; De Aguinaga JG; Mikat H; Schüth C; Liedl R
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(4):573-83. PubMed ID: 23750914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical postcalibration uncertainty analysis: Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
    James SC; Doherty JE; Eddebbarh AA
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):851-69. PubMed ID: 19744249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Highly parameterized inversion of groundwater reactive transport for a complex field site.
    Carniato L; Schoups G; van de Giesen N; Seuntjens P; Bastiaens L; Sapion H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Feb; 173():38-58. PubMed ID: 25528244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the Quantification of Model Uncertainty: A Bayesian Perspective.
    Kaplan D
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):215-238. PubMed ID: 33721184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian maximum entropy-based methodology for optimal spatiotemporal design of groundwater monitoring networks.
    Hosseini M; Kerachian R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Sep; 189(9):433. PubMed ID: 28779429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model.
    Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination of the uncertainty in contaminant fate and transport modeling: a case study in the Venice Lagoon.
    Sommerfreund J; Arhonditsis GB; Diamond ML; Frignani M; Capodaglio G; Gerino M; Bellucci L; Giuliani S; Mugnai C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Mar; 73(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 19493571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.