These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24891212)

  • 1. Accuracy of surgical wound drainage measurements: an analysis and comparison.
    Yue B; Nizzero D; Zhang C; van Zyl N; Ting J
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 May; 85(5):327-9. PubMed ID: 24891212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prolonged Jackson-Pratt drainage in the management of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid leaks.
    Hughes SA; Ozgur BM; German M; Taylor WR
    Surg Neurol; 2006 Apr; 65(4):410-4, discussion 414-5. PubMed ID: 16531215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-pressure gradients generated by closed-suction surgical drainage systems.
    Grobmyer SR; Graham D; Brennan MF; Coit D
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 12542925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exposure risks related to the management of three wound drainage systems.
    Zerbe M; McArdle A; Goldrick B
    Am J Infect Control; 1996 Oct; 24(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 8902108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suction forces generated by passive bile bag drainage on a model of post-subdural hematoma evacuation.
    Tenny SO; Thorell WE
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Jul; 160(7):1305-1309. PubMed ID: 29728776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing an experimental model for surgical drainage investigations: an initial report.
    Swartz AL; Azuh O; Obeid LV; Munaco AJ; Toursavadkohi S; Adams J; Dulchavsky M; Dobie L; Berardo DJ; Horst M; Patton JH; Falvo AJ; Rubinfeld I
    Am J Surg; 2012 Mar; 203(3):388-91; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 22364905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison consequences of Jackson-Pratt drain versus chest tube after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Mirmohammad-Sadeghi M; Pourazari P; Akbari M
    J Res Med Sci; 2017; 22():134. PubMed ID: 29387121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Value of a single low-pressure drain in the postoperative care of bilateral thyroidectomies. Retrospective comparison with bilateral Redon drains].
    Benoit L; L'Helgouarc'h JL; Goudet P; Cougard P
    Ann Chir; 1999; 53(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10089665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved method for intra-abdominal drainage.
    Vercoutere AL; Humphrey R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Jun; 158(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 6729681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of an Automatic Jackson-Pratt Drain Auxiliary System for Postoperative Management Applications.
    Seol J; Yoon KC; Park J; Kim KG
    Surg Innov; 2023 Apr; 30(2):271-274. PubMed ID: 35703392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive retrieval of a retained Jackson--Pratt drainage tube using the Sachse urethrotome.
    Fariña-Perez LA; Pesqueira-Santiago D
    Arch Esp Urol; 2012 May; 65(4):496-8. PubMed ID: 22619142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedures Never Explained in Textbooks: How to Correctly Convert a Closed-Suction Drain to a Closed-Gravity Drain, and How to Correctly Remove a Closed-Suction Drain Off Suction.
    Stelmar J; Smith SM; Chen A; Masterson JM; Hu V; Garcia MM
    J Surg Res (Houst); 2022; 5(3):419-422. PubMed ID: 36285252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases.
    Icard P; Chautard J; Zhang X; Juanico M; Bichi S; Lerochais JP; Flais F
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Oct; 30(4):649-51. PubMed ID: 16934988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].
    Chintamani ; Singhal V; Singh J; Bansal A; Saxena S
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Jan; 5():11. PubMed ID: 15676064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timing of re-transfusion drain removal following total knee replacement.
    Leeman MF; Costa ML; Costello E; Edwards D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Mar; 88(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 16551400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new adaptation for a secure surgical drain placement and a comparison with four common drain fixation methods.
    Heskin L; Cahill V; Filobbos G; Regan P; O'Sullivan ST; Bryan K
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Jan; 101(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 30328703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?
    McCormack TT; Abel PD; Collins CD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Sep; 65(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 6614773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sump drainage versus static drainage after cholecystectomy.
    van der Linden W; Gedda S; Edlund G
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jun; 152(6):829-30. PubMed ID: 7244965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery.
    Newcomb AE; Alphonso N; Nørgaard MA; Cochrane AD; Karl TR; Brizard CP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):395-9; discussion 399-400. PubMed ID: 15740945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pressure-volume analysis of wound suction drainage containers and suction capacity of drainage tubes].
    Mohadjer C; Siegert R; Jäger H; Weidauer H
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1994; 379(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 7990623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.