BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489147)

  • 1. [Development of the craniofacial structures and mandibular growth rotation: a longitudinal study with Enlow analysis (counterpart analysis)].
    Işeri H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 2489147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Prediction of mandibular growth rotation].
    Işeri H; Köklü A
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 2489148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis.
    Cevidanes LH; Franco AA; Scanavini MA; Vigorito JW; Enlow DH; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 12695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN angle males: a longitudinal study.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 8526293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of intracranial relations in patients aged 10 to 18 years with clefts of the lip and palate, using cluster analysis.
    Velemínská J; Müllerová Z
    Acta Chir Plast; 2001; 43(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 11789054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal cephalometric changes in the maxilla, mandible and maxillary-mandibular relationship between 10 and 14 years of age.
    Aydemir S; Ceylan I; Eröz UB
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Nov; 15(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 10806935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):720-8. PubMed ID: 16159349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Predicting of growth tendency with cephalometry. Cephalometric research comparing orthodontic treatment cases with four premolar extraction].
    Szabó GT; Herényi G; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2007 Feb; 100(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17444131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.
    Verma D; Peltomäki T; Jäger A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 19395369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial growth in males 16 to 20 years of age.
    Love RJ; Murray JM; Mamandras AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Mar; 97(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2309666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relation between cranial base flexure and position of the jaws.
    Rak D; Muretić Z; Slaj M
    Coll Antropol; 1997 Dec; 21(2):539-47. PubMed ID: 9439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in mandibular ramus growth: a histologic study.
    Hans MG; Enlow DH; Noachtar R
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 8526292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of maximum mandibular movements, craniofacial relationships and temporomandibular joint awareness in children.
    Rothenberg LH
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 2064068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The aging craniofacial complex: a longitudinal cephalometric study from late adolescence to late adulthood.
    Pecora NG; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 18929267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.