These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489149)

  • 21. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pavlow SS; McGorray SP; Taylor MG; Dolce C; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A cephalometric comparison of orthopedic (Activator) headgear and orthodontic (Edgewise) treatments in Class II, 1 malocclusions].
    Altuğ Z
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 May; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3271149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The vertical changes of orthodontic area with treatment and retention in extraction cases].
    Uner O; Dincer M
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):12-30. PubMed ID: 2489132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.
    Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in the TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Arat ZM; Gökalp H; Erdem D; Erden I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 11244427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The effect of cervical headgear on the cant of occlusal plane].
    Gültan A
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 2489151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Functional appliance treatment assessed using the PAR index.
    Wijayaratne D; Harkness M; Herbison P
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):118-26. PubMed ID: 12476494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method.
    Ferro F; Monsurró A; Perillo L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Evaluation of facial profile changes in individuals with skeletal Class II anomaly treated with activator and activator + occipital headgear].
    Gögen H; Parlar S
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 2489162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Research and establishment of the computerized orthodontic and orthopedic prediction system].
    Zhou J; Luo S; Yu X; Huang N
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Feb; 19(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 12539639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Long-term results of treatment of distal occlusion with the function regulator].
    Falck F
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1991 Oct; 52(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 1757015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [A clinical study of the effect of a rigid open activator (ROA) in the treatment of Angle class II.1].
    Bachratý A; Bachratá L
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Oct; 55(5):228-35. PubMed ID: 7995604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The changes in orthodontic area after retention period in skeletal Class 2 cases treated with activator].
    Uner O; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 2489149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evaluation of results in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bionator].
    Yiğit MD; Akin SZ
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 2489153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.