These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489151)

  • 1. [The effect of cervical headgear on the cant of occlusal plane].
    Gültan A
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 2489151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occlusal Plane and Skeletal Changes After Cervical Headgear Treatment With and Without Lower Utility Arch in Class II Growing Patients.
    Sambataro S; Bocchieri S; Fastuca R; Giuntini V; Fiorillo L; Cicciù M; Caprioglio A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 May; 32(3):1152-1156. PubMed ID: 33278255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method.
    Ferro F; Monsurró A; Perillo L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled study of early headgear treatment on occlusal stability--a 13 year follow-up.
    Krusinskiene V; Kiuttu P; Julku J; Silvola AS; Kantomaa T; Pirttiniemi P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 18632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
    Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of cervical headgear therapy on point B in class II, division 1 cases].
    Ulgen M; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 2489160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.