These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489152)

  • 1. [Evaluation of results in Class II: division 1 malocclusions by treated Frankel appliance].
    Yiğit MD; Akin SZ
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 2489152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of results in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bionator].
    Yiğit MD; Akin SZ
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 2489153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Use of the Frankel functional regulator in Class II, div. 1].
    Silvestri A; Spagnuolo A; Sciarretta MG
    Mondo Ortod; 1989; 14(5):647-62. PubMed ID: 2640949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional appliance treatment assessed using the PAR index.
    Wijayaratne D; Harkness M; Herbison P
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):118-26. PubMed ID: 12476494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Functional therapy of Class II Division 1. Comparison of three activators: Andresen, Fränkel and Teuscher].
    Bertelè G; Leoci T; Stella F; Pisano C
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Apr; 48(4):115-23. PubMed ID: 10431533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].
    Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
    Demirović D; Filipović M
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The functional regulator (FR II)].
    Işiksal E; Seçkin O
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 2101653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cephalometric evaluation of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion cases treated with the Bimler appliance].
    Calegari MA; Petrelli E; Rodrigues AM
    Dens (Curitiba); 1990; 6(1-2):16-24. PubMed ID: 2131271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The changes in orthodontic area after retention period in skeletal Class 2 cases treated with activator].
    Uner O; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 2489149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel.
    Freeman DC; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Fränkel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):570.e1-6; discussion 570-1. PubMed ID: 19409337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Research and establishment of the computerized orthodontic and orthopedic prediction system].
    Zhou J; Luo S; Yu X; Huang N
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Feb; 19(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 12539639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Investigation of the vertical variations in the anterior region of Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated with different techniques].
    Hamamci O
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 2489155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The stimulation of the rotation of the mandible with Angle Class II/1 and II/2 malocclusion with functional regulators and activators as compared to the control group].
    Stüber P
    Stomatol DDR; 1990 Mar; 40(3):112-4. PubMed ID: 2284653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.
    Fischer-Brandies H
    Int J Orthod; 1989; 27(3-4):9-13. PubMed ID: 2592152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary skeletal and dental change with Fränkel appliance therapy--an implant study.
    Brieden CM; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Kulbersh R
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jul; 54(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 6385783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.