These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489159)

  • 1. [Tracing and measuring errors in the roentgenographic cephalometry].
    Erdem A; Ceylan I; Deniz E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 2489159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients.
    Lau PY; Cooke MS; Hägg U
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 9511491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen--canal and groove: an anatomical and cephalometric study.
    Kazkayasi M; Ergin A; Ersoy M; Bengi O; Tekdemir I; Elhan A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):609-14. PubMed ID: 11359128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Longitudinal study of dental arch forms, with special reference to normal and malocclusions].
    Sato A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Sep; 27(3):635-72. PubMed ID: 2641441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of factors associated with volumetric data errors in gamma knife radiosurgery.
    Yang DY; Sheehan J; Liu YS; ChangLai SP; Pan HC; Chen CJ; Chou MC
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2009; 87(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19039257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The variability of roentgenographic cephalometric lines of reference.
    Wei SH
    Angle Orthod; 1968 Jan; 38(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 5236053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of the cephalometric characteristics of snoring patients and apneic patients as a function of the degree of obesity. Apropos of 162 cases].
    Iked N; Hazime N; Dekeister C; Folia M; Tiberge M; Paoli JR
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Nov; 102(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 11862899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial anthropometrics versus cephalometry as predictors for surgical treatment in patients with Class III dentofacial deformities.
    Magalhaes AE; Stella JP; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9082019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sodium balance in premature infants].
    Prekajski NB; Ljujić M; Dudić S; Ranković M
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(1-2):6-12. PubMed ID: 9525076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients.
    Wah PL; Cooke MS; Hägg U
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9081997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized crossover study to evaluate LDL-cholesterol lowering effect of a generic product of simvastatin (Unison Company) compared to simvastatin (Zocor) in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
    Assawawitoontip S; Wiwanitkit V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():S118-24. PubMed ID: 12188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of extensive functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) on facial growth in children with cystic fibrosis. Comparison of 10 cephalometric parameters of the midface for three study groups.
    Van Peteghem A; Clement PA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 70(8):1407-13. PubMed ID: 16621034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.