These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489161)
21. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances. Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study. Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies. Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method. Ferro F; MonsurrĂ³ A; Perillo L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance]. Chabre C Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes. Derringer K Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension. Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Skeletal, dental, and functional effects of headgear-activator therapy on Class II malocclusion in Japanese: a clinical case report. Deguchi T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Sep; 100(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 1877554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients. LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances. Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion. Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype. Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patients. Schiavon Gandini MR; Gandini LG; Da Rosa Martins JC; Del Santo M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):531-8; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 11343026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An evaluation of growth and stability in untreated and treated subjects. Driscoll-Gilliland J; Buschang PH; Behrents RG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):588-97. PubMed ID: 11742303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Mills CM; McCulloch KJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Stahl F; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 18617112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment]. Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]