These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24891723)

  • 1. Highly Nonlinear Solitary Waves for the Assessment of Dental Implant Mobility.
    Berhanu B; Rizzo P; Ochs M
    J Appl Mech; 2013 Jan; 80(1):0110281-110288. PubMed ID: 24891723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A solitary wave-based sensor to monitor the setting of fresh concrete.
    Rizzo P; Ni X; Nassiri S; Vandenbossche J
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Jul; 14(7):12568-84. PubMed ID: 25025549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wireless Module for Nondestructive Testing/Structural Health Monitoring Applications Based on Solitary Waves.
    Misra R; Jalali Najafabadi H; Dickerson S; Rizzo P
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32466605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the Reliability of a Solitary Wave Based Transducer to Determine the Characteristics of Some Materials.
    Deng W; Nasrollahi A; Rizzo P; Li K
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 26703617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Actuators for the generation of highly nonlinear solitary waves.
    Ni X; Rizzo P; Daraio C
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Mar; 82(3):034902. PubMed ID: 21456779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser-based excitation of nonlinear solitary waves in a chain of particles.
    Ni X; Rizzo P; Daraio C
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Aug; 84(2 Pt 2):026601. PubMed ID: 21929122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study on three different transducers for the measurement of nonlinear solitary waves.
    Ni X; Cai L; Rizzo P
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Jan; 13(1):1231-46. PubMed ID: 23334611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic behavior of implants as a measure of osseointegration.
    Ramp LC; Jeffcoat RL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 11669245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of nondestructive test methods and their application to measure the stability and osseointegration of bone anchored endosseous implants.
    Meredith N
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 10065892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling ultrasonic wave propagation in a dental implant - Bone system.
    Dorogoy A; Haïat G; Shemtov-Yona K; Rittel D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103547. PubMed ID: 31778910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration.
    Piattelli A; Degidi M; Paolantonio M; Mangano C; Scarano A
    Biomaterials; 2003 Oct; 24(22):4081-9. PubMed ID: 12834604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the electromechanical impedance technique for the assessment of dental implant stability.
    LaMalfa Ribolla E; Rizzo P
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):1713-20. PubMed ID: 26070645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical analysis of the osseointegration of porous tantalum implants.
    Fraser D; Funkenbusch P; Ercoli C; Meirelles L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):811-820. PubMed ID: 31703918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex vivo mechanical properties of dental implant bone cement used to rescue initially unstable dental implants: a rabbit study.
    Seong WJ; Kim HC; Jeong S; DeVeau DL; Aparicio C; Li Y; Hodges JS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):826-36. PubMed ID: 21841993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.
    Meredith N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 9922740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Axial stress determination using highly nonlinear solitary waves.
    Nasrollahi A; Rizzo P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Oct; 144(4):2201. PubMed ID: 30404489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs.
    Zanetti EM; Ciaramella S; Calì M; Pascoletti G; Martorelli M; Asero R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 29891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Damping Factor as a Diagnostic Parameter for Assessment of Osseointegration during the Dental Implant Healing Process: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.
    Feng SW; Ho KN; Chan YH; Chang KJ; Lai WY; Huang HM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Dec; 44(12):3668-3678. PubMed ID: 27307008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanoadaptive strain and functional osseointegration of dental implants in rats.
    Wang B; Kim K; Srirangapatanam S; Ustriyana P; Wheelis SE; Fakra S; Kang M; Rodrigues DC; Ho SP
    Bone; 2020 Aug; 137():115375. PubMed ID: 32335376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.