These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24893113)

  • 1. Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water.
    Fielding KS; Roiko AH
    Water Res; 2014 Sep; 61():86-96. PubMed ID: 24893113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on "Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water" by Fielding, K.S. and Roiko, A.H., 2014 [Water Research 61, 86-96].
    de Koster W; Achterberg P
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 84():372-4. PubMed ID: 26142075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informing public attitudes to non-potable water reuse - The impact of message framing.
    Goodwin D; Raffin M; Jeffrey P; Smith HM
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():125-135. PubMed ID: 30125815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring objective knowledge of potable recycled water.
    Mahmoud-Elhaj D; Tanner B; Sabatini D; Feltz A
    J Community Psychol; 2020 Aug; 48(6):2033-2052. PubMed ID: 32613613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluorescence monitoring at a recycled water treatment plant and associated dual distribution system--implications for cross-connection detection.
    Hambly AC; Henderson RK; Storey MV; Baker A; Stuetz RM; Khan SJ
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5323-33. PubMed ID: 20655084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all information is informative: An exploration of educational content on recycled potable water knowledge and acceptance.
    Tanner B; McDonald P; Mahmoud-Elhaj D; Sabatini D; Chamberlain JF; Nijhawan A; Rainbolt-Forbes E; Feltz A
    Water Res; 2024 Mar; 252():121254. PubMed ID: 38335749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters.
    Dolnicar S; Schäfer AI
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):888-900. PubMed ID: 18433981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model.
    Ross VL; Fielding KS; Louis WR
    J Environ Manage; 2014 May; 137():61-8. PubMed ID: 24603028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of social attitude to the new end use of recycled water for household laundry in Australia by the regression models.
    Chen Z; Ngo HH; Guo W; Wang XC; Miechel C; Corby N; Listowski A; O'Halloran K
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 126():79-84. PubMed ID: 23666073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision and perception of community on the use of recycled water for household laundry: a case study in Australia.
    Mainali B; Pham TT; Ngo HH; Guo W; Miechel C; O'Halloran K; Muthukaruppan M; Listowski A
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():657-66. PubMed ID: 23842537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recycled or reclaimed? The effect of terminology on water reuse perceptions.
    McClaran N; Behe BK; Huddleston P; Fernandez RT
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110144. PubMed ID: 32148255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic analysis of fluorescence signals for monitoring dual reticulation water recycling schemes.
    Hambly A; Henderson RK; Baker A; Stuetz RM; Khan SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2059-65. PubMed ID: 21045332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urban versus regional--how public attitudes to recycled water differ in these contexts.
    Hurlimann AC
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(6):891-9. PubMed ID: 18413950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public perception of drinking water from private water supplies: focus group analyses.
    Jones AQ; Dewey CE; Doré K; Majowicz SE; McEwen SA; Waltner-Toews D; Henson SJ; Mathews E
    BMC Public Health; 2005 Dec; 5():129. PubMed ID: 16336678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening health risk assessment of micropullutants for indirect potable reuse schemes: a three-tiered approach.
    Rodriguez C; Cook A; Van Buynder P; Devine B; Weinstein P
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(11):35-42. PubMed ID: 18057639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use--an evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis.
    Hurlimann A; McKay J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 16678338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advanced oxidation for indirect potable reuse: a practical application in Australia.
    Poussade Y; Roux A; Walker T; Zavlanos V
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2419-24. PubMed ID: 19901475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drinking water from alternative water sources: differences in beliefs, social norms and factors of perceived behavioural control across eight Australian locations.
    Dolnicar S; Hurlimann A
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1433-44. PubMed ID: 19759446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of information on public acceptance--the case of water from alternative sources.
    Dolnicar S; Hurlimann A; Nghiem LD
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1288-93. PubMed ID: 20227166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expert opinion on risks to the long-term viability of residential recycled water schemes: An Australian study.
    West C; Kenway S; Hassall M; Yuan Z
    Water Res; 2017 Sep; 120():133-145. PubMed ID: 28478291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.