138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24893217)
1. Visual search and attention in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata): Associative cuing and sequential priming.
Goto K; Bond AB; Burks M; Kamil AC
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 24893217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
Beesley T; Shanks DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing.
Adam JJ; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contextual cuing: the effects of stimulus variation, intentionality, and aging.
Lyon J; Scialfa C; Cordazzo S; Bubric K
Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 24821293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attentional effects on orientation judgements are dependent on memory consolidation processes.
Haskell C; Anderson B
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2147-65. PubMed ID: 26595533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search.
Ball K; Smith D; Ellison A; Schenk T
Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1585-91. PubMed ID: 19084545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance.
Hernández M; Costa A; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):963-72. PubMed ID: 20436193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
Mayr U
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?
Becker SI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):324-39. PubMed ID: 17868628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention and the detection of masked radial frequency patterns: Data and model.
Smith PL; Lee YE; Wolfgang BJ; Ratcliff R
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1363-77. PubMed ID: 18538812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.
Schmidt J; Zelinsky GJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1904-14. PubMed ID: 19459137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing.
Kiss M; Van Velzen J; Eimer M
Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 17971061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased perceptual distraction and task demand enhances gaze and non-biological cuing effects.
Gregory SE; Jackson MC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Feb; 74(2):221-240. PubMed ID: 32988328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
Thomas MD; Williams CC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.
Jones CM; Gray R; Spence C; Tan HZ
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 18224305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
Poole BJ; Kane MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search.
Dalton P; Lavie N
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
