These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489334)

  • 21. Enhanced speed and precision of measurement in a computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system.
    Chen SK; Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Aug; 74(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 15387028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital image enhancement of cephalograms.
    Oka SW; Trussell HJ
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Personal Computer-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection With Deep Learning, Using Cephalograms on the Internet.
    Nishimoto S; Sotsuka Y; Kawai K; Ishise H; Kakibuchi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 30439733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.
    Rakhshan V; Rakhshan H; Sheibaninia A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 20108870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
    Erkan M; Gurel HG; Nur M; Demirel B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 21502380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.
    Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Development of automatic cephalometric analysis by image processing. Automatic extraction of landmarks].
    Ishikawa H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Mar; 46(1):32-49. PubMed ID: 3506550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.
    Sommer T; Ciesielski R; Erbersdobler J; Orthuber W; Fischer-Brandies H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 19700534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The study of automatic cephalometric analysis system].
    Zhang X; Zhang Z; Zhang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 34(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 11834164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.
    Meriç P; Naoumova J
    Turk J Orthod; 2020 Sep; 33(3):142-149. PubMed ID: 32974059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiography, Part 1: Advantages and limitations of digital imaging.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8678344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Development of a computerized automatic identification system for use in cephalometry].
    Li S; Wu Q; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):466-8. PubMed ID: 12641966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of an automated cephalometric analysis system.
    Forsyth DB; Davis DN
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Oct; 18(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 8942096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Application of digital image processing techniques in cephalometry].
    Jäger A; Doler W; Bockermann V; Steinhöfel N; Radlanski RJ
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Mar; 44(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 2639033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The reliability and reproducibility of an Android cephalometric smartphone application in comparison with the conventional method.
    Zamrik OM; İşeri H
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Mar; 91(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 33367490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.