These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The German REACH Congress 2016: a workshop report. Reihlen A; Jepsen D; Broschinski L; Luch A; Schulte A Arch Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 92(3):1343-1347. PubMed ID: 29453549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are chemicals in articles an obstacle for reaching environmental goals? - Missing links in EU chemical management. Molander L; Breitholtz M; Andersson PL; Rybacka A; Rudén C Sci Total Environ; 2012 Oct; 435-436():280-9. PubMed ID: 22858536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Time matters: A stock-pollution approach to authorisation decision-making for PBT/vPvB chemicals under REACH. Gabbert S; Hilber I J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():236-244. PubMed ID: 27594688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro and in vivo analysis of pro- and anti-inflammatory effects of weak and strong contact allergens. Lass C; Merfort I; Martin SF Exp Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1007-13. PubMed ID: 20701630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive. Safford RJ; Api AM; Roberts DW; Lalko JF Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Aug; 72(3):694-701. PubMed ID: 25934255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proteomic analysis of haptenation by skin sensitisers: Diphencyprone and ethyl acrylate. Parkinson E; Aleksic M; Arthur R; Regufe Da Mota S; Cubberley R; Skipp PJ Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Feb; 62():104697. PubMed ID: 31669365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the predictive nature of the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay with mammalian assays in determining the skin sensitisation potential of agrochemical active ingredients. Masinja W; Elliott C; Modi S; Enoch SJ; Cronin MTD; McInnes EF; Currie RA Toxicol In Vitro; 2021 Feb; 70():105017. PubMed ID: 33038465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of guinea pig data to obtain starting points for skin sensitisation risk assessment - A commentary. Basketter D; Corea N; Corvaro M; Grivel A; Kluxen FM; Morgan N; Wiemann C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Mar; 148():105584. PubMed ID: 38417477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reference Chemical Potency List (RCPL): A new tool for evaluating the accuracy of skin sensitisation potency measurements by New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). Irizar A; Bender H; Griem P; Natsch A; Vey M; Kimber I Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Oct; 134():105244. PubMed ID: 35932886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sodium metabisulfite as a contact allergen--an example of a rare chemical mechanism for protein modification. Roberts DW; Basketter D; Kimber I; White J; McFadden J; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 22320665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are skin sensitisation test methods relevant for proteins? Basketter DA; Kimber I Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Nov; 99():244-248. PubMed ID: 30268830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Designation of substances as skin sensitizing chemicals: a commentary. Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Roggeband R; Basketter DA Hum Exp Toxicol; 2003 Aug; 22(8):439-43. PubMed ID: 12948084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Danger, intracellular signaling, and the orchestration of dendritic cell function in skin sensitization. Ainscough JS; Frank Gerberick G; Dearman RJ; Kimber I J Immunotoxicol; 2013; 10(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 22954466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]