These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489495)

  • 1. [Investigation of the functional treatment effects of the skeletal and dental Class III anomalies on the skeletal region].
    Altuğ Z; Erdem D; Rübendüz M
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 2489495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation of the effect of functional treatment in skeletal Class III cases on the profile facial esthetics].
    Altuğ Z; Erdem D; Rübendüz M
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 2101659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentofacial changes in patients with Class III malocclusions treated by a combination of activator and chin-cup appliances.
    Basdra EK; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 9528405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion.
    Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stability of changes associated with chin cup treatment.
    Deguchi T; Kitsugi A
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 8712492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Critical evaluation of the relations between onset and outcome of treatment in the management of mesial bite].
    Wilhelm-Nold I; Droschl H
    Z Stomatol; 1989 May; 86(3):139-52. PubMed ID: 2638066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup.
    Ferro A; Nucci LP; Ferro F; Gallo C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 12695770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance.
    Atalay Z; Tortop T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 20348164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cap appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points.
    Arun T; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):392-8. PubMed ID: 9582620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study.
    Saadia M; Torres E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):669-80. PubMed ID: 10842110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preliminary study of non-surgical treatment of severe Class III malocclusion in 18 patients of 12-20 years old].
    Lin JX; Gu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15061874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facemask therapy with and without expansion.
    Tortop T; Keykubat A; Yuksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 17920499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.