These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24895168)

  • 21. Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
    Gómez-Gil V; Rodríguez M; García-Moreno Nisa F; Pérez-Köhler B; Pascual G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0213005. PubMed ID: 30811503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nitric oxide modulates metalloproteinase-2, collagen deposition and adhesion rate after polypropylene mesh implantation in the intra-abdominal wall.
    Moretti AI; Pinto FJ; Cury V; Jurado MC; Marcondes W; Velasco IT; Souza HP
    Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 21864729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses.
    Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Sotomayor S; Pérez-Köhler B; Bellón JM
    Hernia; 2012 Dec; 16(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22744412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do collagen meshes offer any benefits over preclude® ePTFE implants in contaminated surgical fields? A comparative in vitro and in vivo study.
    García-Pumarino R; Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Pérez-Köhler B; Bellón JM
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2014 Feb; 102(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 24000231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Butler CE; Prieto VG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 15277815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: a comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes.
    Konerding MA; Chantereau P; Delventhal V; Holste JL; Ackermann M
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):806-16. PubMed ID: 21992970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Behaviour of a new composite mesh for the repair of full-thickness abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model.
    Pascual G; Sotomayor S; Rodríguez M; Bayon Y; Bellón JM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80647. PubMed ID: 24236192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sutures versus new cyanoacrylates in prosthetic abdominal wall repair: a preclinical long-term study.
    Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Mesa-Ciller C; Pérez-Köhler B; Fernández-Gutiérrez M; San Román J; Bellón JM
    J Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 220():30-39. PubMed ID: 29180195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraperitoneal meshes in the repair of abdominal wall defects: comparison of polyester with collagen versus polypropylene with polyglycolic acid.
    de Araújo UR; Czeczko NG; Ribas-Filho JM; Malafaia O; Budel VM; Balderrama CM; Zimmermann E; Dietz UA
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Jul; 36(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 20076905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tissue integration and inflammatory reaction in full-thickness abdominal wall repair using an innovative composite mesh.
    Pascual G; Sotomayor S; Rodríguez M; Bayon Y; Bellón JM
    Hernia; 2016 Aug; 20(4):607-22. PubMed ID: 25903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Host tissue response by the expression of collagen to cyanoacrylate adhesives used in implant fixation for abdominal hernia repair.
    Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Pérez-Köhler B; Mesa-Ciller C; Fernández-Gutiérrez M; San Román J; Bellón JM
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 Apr; 28(4):58. PubMed ID: 28210969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.
    Gruber-Blum S; Brand J; Keibl C; Fortelny RH; Redl H; Mayer F; Petter-Puchner AH
    Hernia; 2017 Apr; 21(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 28012032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chemical adhesion barriers: do they affect the intraperitoneal behavior of a composite mesh?
    Rodríguez M; Pascual G; Sotomayor S; Pérez-Köhler B; Cifuentes A; Bellón JM
    J Invest Surg; 2011; 24(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 21524177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resorbable Synthetic Meshes for Abdominal Wall Defects in Preclinical Setting: A Literature Review.
    Miserez M; Jairam AP; Boersema GSA; Bayon Y; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():67-75. PubMed ID: 30710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical and morphological study of a new elastic mesh (Ciberlastic) to repair abdominal wall defects.
    Calvo B; Pascual G; Peña E; Pérez-Khöler B; Rodríguez M; Bellón JM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():366-378. PubMed ID: 26905037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Regulation of Peritoneal Inflammatory Response to Implant Material Using an Ex Vivo Model System.
    Pengelly S; Carlson GL; Berry JEA; Bell CR; Herrick SE
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():202-210. PubMed ID: 31753555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.
    Scheidbach H; Tamme C; Tannapfel A; Lippert H; Köckerling F
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Feb; 18(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 14691711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study).
    Alimoglu O; Akcakaya A; Sahin M; Unlu Y; Ozkan OV; Sanli E; Eryilmaz R
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(51):725-8. PubMed ID: 12828071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical behavior of surgical meshes for abdominal wall repair: In vivo versus biaxial characterization.
    Simón-Allué R; Ortillés A; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jun; 82():102-111. PubMed ID: 29579555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Remodeling characteristics and collagen distribution in biological scaffold materials explanted from human subjects after abdominal soft tissue reconstruction: an analysis of scaffold remodeling characteristics by patient risk factors and surgical site classifications.
    Cavallo JA; Roma AA; Jasielec MS; Ousley J; Creamer J; Pichert MD; Baalman S; Frisella MM; Matthews BD; Deeken CR
    Ann Surg; 2015 Feb; 261(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 24374547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.