These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2489600)
1. [Normalizing method for determining the mode of crack-propagation in amalgams and composite resins]. Hanawa T; Ota M; Marker VA; Okabe T Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Nov; 8(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2489600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of sub-critical fatigue crack propagation in a restorative composite. Loughran GM; Versluis A; Douglas WH Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 15705432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of contraction stresses in dental composites by analysis of crack propagation in the matrix surrounding a cavity. Yamamoto T; Ferracane JL; Sakaguchi RL; Swain MV Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 19100613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin. Evans DB; Neme AM Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations. Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The composite resin restoration: a literature review, Part III. What the future holds. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8432949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Slow crack propagation in composite restorative materials. Montes-G GM; Draughn RA J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 May; 21(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 3584167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features. Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Lee JK Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 8511280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantitative evaluation by measuring affected area for cytotoxicity of dental materials]. Kaga M; Ito Y; Okabe T; Oguchi H; Ota M Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):591-9. PubMed ID: 2134824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials. Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Alternative filling methods for premolars and molars]. Sperr W Z Stomatol; 1989 May; 86(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 2638068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [AE characteristics during compression test of high-copper amalgams and visible light-cured composite resins]. Kondo S; Ohkawa S; Hanawa T; Sugawara T; Ota M Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Mar; 8(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 2603095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]