These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24896260)

  • 1. Reliability of different mark-recapture methods for population size estimation tested against reference population sizes constructed from field data.
    Grimm A; Gruber B; Henle K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98840. PubMed ID: 24896260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the abundance of mouse populations of known size: promises and pitfalls of new methods.
    Conn PB; Arthur AD; Bailey LL; Singleton GR
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Apr; 16(2):829-37. PubMed ID: 16711066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears.
    Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critical look at some widely used estimators in mark-resighting experiments.
    Fattorini L; Marcheselli M; Monaco A; Pisani C
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Sep; 76(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 17714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating population size with noninvasive capture-mark-recapture data.
    Petit E; Valiere N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):1062-73. PubMed ID: 16922223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extending the Lincoln-Petersen estimator for multiple identifications in one source.
    Köse T; Orman M; Ikiz F; Baksh MF; Gallagher J; Böhning D
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4237-49. PubMed ID: 24833434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
    Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Petersen-Lincoln estimator and its extension to estimate the size of a shared population.
    Chao A; Pan HY; Chiang SC
    Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):957-70. PubMed ID: 19067330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing capture-recapture methods for estimation of the size of small and medium-sized populations using empirical data on commercial turkey farms in Canada.
    El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jun; 120(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 25542525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias reduction for multiple-recapture estimators of closed population size.
    Evans MA; Bonett DG
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 8068839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upper bound estimators of the population size based on ordinal models for capture-recapture experiments.
    Alfò M; Böhning D; Rocchetti I
    Biometrics; 2021 Mar; 77(1):237-248. PubMed ID: 32282946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study.
    Alonso RS; McClintock BT; Lyren LM; Boydston EE; Crooks KR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123032. PubMed ID: 25822245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark-recapture data.
    Miller CR; Joyce P; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1991-2005. PubMed ID: 15910321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On population size estimators in the Poisson mixture model.
    Mao CX; Yang N; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 23865502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal.
    Jůnek T; Jůnková Vymyslická P; Hozdecká K; Hejcmanová P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136525. PubMed ID: 26334997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved methods for estimating abundance and related demographic parameters from mark-resight data.
    McClintock BT; White GC; Pryde MA
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 31004437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates.
    Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of capture-recapture monitoring of elusive species illustrated with a threatened grasshopper.
    Bröder L; Tatin L; Hochkirch A; Schuld A; Pabst L; Besnard A
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):743-753. PubMed ID: 31825105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance.
    McNair JN; Ruetz CR; Carlson A; Suh J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200733. PubMed ID: 30067773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.