These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24896483)

  • 1. The role of individual differences and patterns of resolution in the formation of dominance orders in domestic hen triads.
    Cloutier S; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1996 Dec; 38(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 24896483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of individual differences in the formation of triadic dominance orders of male green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri).
    Beaugrand JP; Cotnoir PA
    Behav Processes; 1996 Dec; 38(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 24896488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative importance of initial individual differences, agonistic experience, and assessment accuracy during hierarchy formation: a simulation study.
    Beaugrand JP
    Behav Processes; 1997 Nov; 41(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 24896674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coherent use of information by hens observing their former dominant defeating or being defeated by a stranger.
    Hogue ME; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1996 Dec; 38(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 24896484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of prior victory or defeat in the same site as that of subsequent encounter on the determination of dyadic dominance in the domestic hen.
    Cloutier S; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1995 Sep; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 24897662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of recent experience and weight on hen's agonistic behaviour during dyadic conflict resolution.
    Martin F; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1997 Nov; 41(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 24896672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of hen's weight and recent experience on dyadic conflict outcome.
    Martin F; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1997 Nov; 41(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 24896670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring longitudinal hierarchies: Framework and methods for studying the dynamics of dominance.
    Strauss ED; Holekamp KE
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Apr; 88(4):521-536. PubMed ID: 30664242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hierarchical development of dominance through the winner-loser effect and socio-spatial structure.
    van Haeringen E; Hemelrijk C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0243877. PubMed ID: 35108262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Simple Behavioral Model Predicts the Emergence of Complex Animal Hierarchies.
    Sasaki T; Penick CA; Shaffer Z; Haight KL; Pratt SC; Liebig J
    Am Nat; 2016 Jun; 187(6):765-75. PubMed ID: 27172595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-organizing dominance hierarchies in a wild primate population.
    Franz M; McLean E; Tung J; Altmann J; Alberts SC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The network motif architecture of dominance hierarchies.
    Shizuka D; McDonald DB
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 Apr; 12(105):. PubMed ID: 25762649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peck orders and group size in laying hens: `futures contracts' for non-aggression.
    Pagel M; Dawkins MS
    Behav Processes; 1997 Apr; 40(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 24897609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Merging social hierarchies: Effects on dominance rank in male green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri).
    Earley RL; Dugatkin LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 16919400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Fragility of Individual-Based Explanations of Social Hierarchies: A Test Using Animal Pecking Orders.
    Chase ID; Lindquist WB
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158900. PubMed ID: 27410230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolution of agonistic conflicts in dyads of acquainted green swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri): a game with perfect information.
    Beaugrand JP
    Behav Processes; 1997 Oct; 41(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 24896382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social stress differentially regulates neuroendocrine responses in laying hens: I. Genetic basis of dopamine responses under three different social conditions.
    Cheng HW; Singleton P; Muir WM
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2003 Jul; 28(5):597-611. PubMed ID: 12727129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling Dominance Hierarchies Under Winner and Loser Effects.
    Kura K; Broom M; Kandler A
    Bull Math Biol; 2015 Jun; 77(6):927-52. PubMed ID: 25739931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dominance relationships in male Nepal gray langurs (Semnopithecus schistaceus).
    Perlman RF; Borries C; Koenig A
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Jun; 160(2):208-19. PubMed ID: 26892185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in the dominance hierarchy of captive female Japanese macaques as a consequence of merging two previously established groups.
    Anderson EJ; Weladji RB; Paré P
    Zoo Biol; 2016 Nov; 35(6):505-512. PubMed ID: 27569261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.