These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies]. Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression]. Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Wettability and accuracy of reproduction of impression materials]. Bader F; Setz J Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 May; 46(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 1817049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials during disinfection. Oda Y; Matsumoto T; Sumii T Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 Feb; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8689737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers. Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials. Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8180615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of disinfection and a wetting agent on the wettability of addition-polymerized silicone impression materials. Milward PJ; Waters MG J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 11514803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials. Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials. Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials. Butta R; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Moles DR J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 15942614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. Hondrum SO J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials. Lu H; Nguyen B; Powers JM J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15295324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The effect of filler content on properties of polyaddition-type silicone impression material]. Hosotani M; Katakura N; Kawakami M; Iijima K; Honma H Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 2135525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of a laboratory surfactant on compatibility of type IV dental stones with addition-cured silicone impression materials. Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Butta R; Moles DR Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 18637382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials. Mondon M; Ziegler C Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]