These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24896871)

  • 1. Selecting dominants and subordinates at conflict outcome can confound the effects of prior dominance or subordination experience.
    Bégin J; Beaugrand JP; Zayan R
    Behav Processes; 1996 Jun; 36(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 24896871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in males of green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri).
    Beaugrand JP; Goulet C
    Behav Processes; 2000 Aug; 50(2-3):131-142. PubMed ID: 10969190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Winner and loser effects in lobster cockroach contests for social dominance.
    Kou R; Hsu CC; Chen SC; Chang PY; Fang S
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jan; 107():49-60. PubMed ID: 30528558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stickleback fights: why do winners win? Influence of metabolic and morphometric parameters.
    Guderley H; Couture P
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2005; 78(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 15778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opponent familiarity and contest experience jointly influence contest decisions in Kryptolebias marmoratus.
    Li CY; Yang Y; Lee PY; Hsu Y
    Front Zool; 2014; 11(1):92. PubMed ID: 25530793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resolution of agonistic conflicts in dyads of acquainted green swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri): a game with perfect information.
    Beaugrand JP
    Behav Processes; 1997 Oct; 41(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 24896382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in forebrain androgen receptor expression in winners and losers of male anole aggressive interactions.
    Hattori T; Wilczynski W
    Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 1582():45-54. PubMed ID: 25069090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of prior victory or defeat in the same site as that of subsequent encounter on the determination of dyadic dominance in the domestic hen.
    Cloutier S; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1995 Sep; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 24897662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aggressiveness and memory: subordinate crabs present higher memory ability than dominants after an agonistic experience.
    Kaczer L; Pedetta S; Maldonado H
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2007 Jan; 87(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 16973384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Winning agonistic encounters increases testosterone and androgen receptor expression in Syrian hamsters.
    Clinard CT; Barnes AK; Adler SG; Cooper MA
    Horm Behav; 2016 Nov; 86():27-35. PubMed ID: 27619945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What sets the odds of winning and losing?
    Rutte C; Taborsky M; Brinkhof MW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 16701465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep sleep after social stress: NREM sleep slow-wave activity is enhanced in both winners and losers of a conflict.
    Kamphuis J; Lancel M; Koolhaas JM; Meerlo P
    Brain Behav Immun; 2015 Jul; 47():149-54. PubMed ID: 25585138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contest experience enhances aggressive behaviour in a fly: when losers learn to win.
    Benelli G; Desneux N; Romano D; Conte G; Messing RH; Canale A
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():9347. PubMed ID: 25792294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategy changes in subsequent fights as consequences of winning and losing in fruit fly fights.
    Trannoy S; Kravitz EA
    Fly (Austin); 2017 Apr; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27834611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential effects of prior dominance or subordination experience on conspecific odor preferences in mice.
    Rawleigh JM; Kemble ED; Ostrem J
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Jul; 54(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8327606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of recent experience and weight on hen's agonistic behaviour during dyadic conflict resolution.
    Martin F; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1997 Nov; 41(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 24896672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group composition affects male reproductive partitioning in a cooperatively breeding cichlid.
    Heg D; Jutzeler E; Bonfils D; Mitchell JS
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(19):4359-70. PubMed ID: 19378408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance.
    Karavanich C; Atema J
    Anim Behav; 1998 Dec; 56(6):1553-1560. PubMed ID: 9933553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of previous experience on the agonistic behaviour of male crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus.
    Iwasaki M; Delago A; Nishino H; Aonuma H
    Zoolog Sci; 2006 Oct; 23(10):863-72. PubMed ID: 17116989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contested dominance modifies the anovulatory consequences of social subordination in female marmosets.
    Alencar AI; Sousa MB; Abbott DH; Yamamoto ME
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2006 May; 39(5):647-58. PubMed ID: 16648903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.