These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24898368)
1. The false classification of extinction risk in noisy environments. Connors BM; Cooper AB; Peterman RM; Dulvy NK Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jul; 281(1787):. PubMed ID: 24898368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability in population abundance and the classification of extinction risk. Wilson HB; Kendall BE; Possingham HP Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 21480994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of uncertainty and variability on population declines and IUCN Red List classifications. Rueda-Cediel P; Anderson KE; Regan TJ; Regan HM Conserv Biol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):916-925. PubMed ID: 29356136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining decision thresholds and evaluating indicators when conservation status is measured as a continuum. Connors BM; Cooper AB Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25155174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of indicators of decline in abundance. Porszt EJ; Peterman RM; Dulvy NK; Cooper AB; Irvine JR Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):894-904. PubMed ID: 22741815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unmodeled observation error induces bias when inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence via aural detections. McClintock BT; Bailey LL; Pollock KH; Simons TR Ecology; 2010 Aug; 91(8):2446-54. PubMed ID: 20836466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning. Mace GM; Collen B; Fuller RA; Boakes EH Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Nov; 365(1558):3743-51. PubMed ID: 20980321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. Inger R; Gregory R; Duffy JP; Stott I; Voříšek P; Gaston KJ Ecol Lett; 2015 Jan; 18(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 25363472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population control methods in stochastic extinction and outbreak scenarios. Segura J; Hilker FM; Franco D PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170837. PubMed ID: 28151983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining Occurrence Dynamics when False Positives Occur: Estimating the Range Dynamics of Wolves from Public Survey Data. Miller DA; Nichols JD; Gude JA; Rich LN; Podruzny KM; Hines JE; Mitchell MS PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65808. PubMed ID: 23840372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. More losers than winners: investigating Anthropocene defaunation through the diversity of population trends. Finn C; Grattarola F; Pincheira-Donoso D Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Oct; 98(5):1732-1748. PubMed ID: 37189305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: breeding-season habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies. Flockhart DT; Pichancourt JB; Norris DR; Martin TG J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 24903085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of sighting rate in inferring extinction and threat. McInerny GJ; Roberts DL; Davy AJ; Cribb PJ Conserv Biol; 2006 Apr; 20(2):562-7. PubMed ID: 16903116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are false positives in suicide classification models a risk group? Evidence for "true alarms" in a population-representative longitudinal study of Norwegian adolescents. Haghish EF; Laeng B; Czajkowski N Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1216483. PubMed ID: 37780152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Community extinction patterns in coloured environments. Ruokolainen L; Fowler MS Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Aug; 275(1644):1775-83. PubMed ID: 18445558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalized model-based solutions to false-positive error in species detection/nondetection data. Clare JDJ; Townsend PA; Zuckerberg B Ecology; 2021 Feb; 102(2):e03241. PubMed ID: 33190269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]