These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24901796)

  • 1. Public opinion on nutrition-related policies to combat child obesity, Los Angeles County, 2011.
    Simon PA; Chiang C; Lightstone AS; Shih M
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2014 Jun; 11():E96. PubMed ID: 24901796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neighborhood Food Environment, Diet, and Obesity Among Los Angeles County Adults, 2011.
    Mejia N; Lightstone AS; Basurto-Davila R; Morales DM; Sturm R
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Sep; 12():E143. PubMed ID: 26334715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of school district nutrition policies on dietary intake and overweight: a synthetic control approach.
    Bauhoff S
    Econ Hum Biol; 2014 Jan; 12():45-55. PubMed ID: 23891422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Where there's a will: can highlighting future youth-targeted marketing increase support for soda taxes?
    Roh S; Schuldt JP
    Health Psychol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1610-3. PubMed ID: 24467253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages and unhealthy foods: a qualitative study of key opinion leaders' views.
    Tamir O; Cohen-Yogev T; Furman-Assaf S; Endevelt R
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2018 Jul; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 30064503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The association of soda sales tax and school nutrition laws: a concordance of policies.
    Greathouse KL; Chriqui J; Moser RP; Agurs-Collins T; Perna FM
    Public Health Nutr; 2014 Oct; 17(10):2201-6. PubMed ID: 24477116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economics and obesity policy.
    Lusk JL
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2017 Jun; 41(6):831-834. PubMed ID: 28077861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of public support for nutrition-focused policy, systems and environmental change strategies in Los Angeles County, 2013.
    Robles B; Kuo T
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012654. PubMed ID: 28087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
    Gollust SE; Barry CL; Niederdeppe J
    Prev Med; 2014 Jun; 63():52-7. PubMed ID: 24631499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.
    Moretto N; Kendall E; Whitty J; Byrnes J; Hills AP; Gordon L; Turkstra E; Scuffham P; Comans T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Feb; 11(3):2456-71. PubMed ID: 24583829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Child Health: Implications for Policy.
    Momin SR; Wood AC
    Curr Nutr Rep; 2018 Dec; 7(4):286-293. PubMed ID: 30284177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.
    Barry CL; Niederdeppe J; Gollust SE
    Am J Prev Med; 2013 Feb; 44(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 23332333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do the public support or oppose obesity prevention regulations? Results from a South Australian population survey.
    Farrell LC; Moore VM; Warin MJ; Street JM
    Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Jan; 30(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 29999550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Food environments near home and school related to consumption of soda and fast food.
    Babey SH; Wolstein J; Diamant AL
    Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res; 2011 Jul; (PB2011-6):1-8. PubMed ID: 21830348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soda taxes, soft drink consumption, and children's body mass index.
    Sturm R; Powell LM; Chriqui JF; Chaloupka FJ
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 May; 29(5):1052-8. PubMed ID: 20360173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diet and obesity in Los Angeles County 2007-2012: Is there a measurable effect of the 2008 "Fast-Food Ban"?
    Sturm R; Hattori A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():205-11. PubMed ID: 25779774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are young Canadians supportive of proposed nutrition policies and regulations? An overview of policy support and the impact of socio-demographic factors on public opinion.
    Bhawra J; Reid JL; White CM; Vanderlee L; Raine K; Hammond D
    Can J Public Health; 2018 Aug; 109(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 29981092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public support for restrictions on fast food company sponsorship of community events.
    Pettigrew S; Pescud M; Rosenberg M; Ferguson R; Houghton S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2012; 21(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 23017320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tax on soft drinks to reduce obesity. Lowering the price of "good" foods would be better than taxing "bad" foods in reducing obesity.
    Winkler JT
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f7038. PubMed ID: 24285165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corporate political activity in the context of unhealthy food advertising restrictions across Transport for London: A qualitative case study.
    Lauber K; Hunt D; Gilmore AB; Rutter H
    PLoS Med; 2021 Sep; 18(9):e1003695. PubMed ID: 34473694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.