These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24901997)

  • 1. Chimpanzee choice rates in competitive games match equilibrium game theory predictions.
    Martin CF; Bhui R; Bossaerts P; Matsuzawa T; Camerer C
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jun; 4():5182. PubMed ID: 24901997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), pigeons (Columba livia domestica) match and Nash equilibrate where humans (Homo sapiens) do not.
    Hachiga Y; Schwartz LP; Tripoli C; Michaels S; Kearns D; Silberberg A
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 May; 133(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 30372107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness.
    Kaiser I; Jensen K; Call J; Tomasello M
    Biol Lett; 2012 Dec; 8(6):942-5. PubMed ID: 22896269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction.
    Colman AM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2003 Apr; 26(2):139-53; discussion 153-98. PubMed ID: 14621510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of shared responsibility and competition in perceptual games: a test of a cognitive game-theoretic extension of signal-detection theory.
    Gopher D; Itkin-Webman T; Erev I; Meyer J; Armony L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):325-41. PubMed ID: 10696621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human and macaque pairs employ different coordination strategies in a transparent decision game.
    Moeller S; Unakafov AM; Fischer J; Gail A; Treue S; Kagan I
    Elife; 2023 Jan; 12():. PubMed ID: 36633125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An application of evolutionary game theory to social dilemmas: the traveler's dilemma and the minimum effort coordination game.
    Iyer S; Reyes J; Killingback T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93988. PubMed ID: 24709851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-action equilibrium fails to predict choices in mixed-strategy settings.
    Berger U
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):751. PubMed ID: 29335440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When does "economic man" dominate social behavior?
    Camerer CF; Fehr E
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):47-52. PubMed ID: 16400140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolving cooperation in multichannel games.
    Donahue K; Hauser OP; Nowak MA; Hilbe C
    Nat Commun; 2020 Aug; 11(1):3885. PubMed ID: 32753599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game.
    Lee D; Conroy ML; McGreevy BP; Barraclough DJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15561500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Animal behaviour: chimpanzee choice and prosociality.
    Beninger RJ; Quinsey VL
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):E6; discussion E6. PubMed ID: 16598208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Multilevel Replicator Dynamics for General Two-Strategy Social Dilemma.
    Cooney DB
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 May; 82(6):66. PubMed ID: 32474720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation.
    McNamara JM; Barta Z; Fromhage L; Houston AI
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7175):189-92. PubMed ID: 18185587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social cycling and conditional responses in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game.
    Wang Z; Xu B; Zhou HJ
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jul; 4():5830. PubMed ID: 25060115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games.
    McCabe KA; Rassenti SJ; Smith VL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Nov; 93(23):13421-8. PubMed ID: 8917607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian nonparametric models characterize instantaneous strategies in a competitive dynamic game.
    McDonald KR; Broderick WF; Huettel SA; Pearson JM
    Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1808. PubMed ID: 31000712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making.
    Vlaev I; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 16478346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fairness evolution in the ultimatum game is a function of reward size.
    Härdling R
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):720-4. PubMed ID: 17350654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience.
    Sanfey AG
    Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5850):598-602. PubMed ID: 17962552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.