These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24902071)

  • 1. [Implementation of a scale on stone baskets].
    Cordes J; Nguyen F; Pinkowski W; Jocham D
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 24902071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A New Automatically Fixating Stone Basket (2.5 F) Prototype with a Nitinol Spring for Accurate Ureteroscopic Stone Size Measurement.
    Cordes J; Nguyen F; Pinkowski W; Merseburger AS; Ozimek T
    Adv Ther; 2018 Sep; 35(9):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 30078174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between an in vitro ureteroscopic stone size estimation and the stone size measurement with the help of a scale on stone baskets.
    Cordes J; Teske L; Nguyen F; Pinkowski W; Sievert KD; Vonthein R
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1303-9. PubMed ID: 26847338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the Escape nitinol stone retrieval basket facilitates fragmentation and extraction of ureteral and renal calculi: a pilot study.
    Kesler SS; Pierre SA; Brison DI; Preminger GM; Munver R
    J Endourol; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18578653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience.
    Desai MR; Patel SB; Desai MM; Kukreja R; Sabnis RB; Desai RM; Patel SH
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1985-8. PubMed ID: 11956424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative investigations on the retrieval capabilities of various baskets and graspers in four ex vivo models.
    Ptashnyk T; Cueva-Martinez A; Michel MS; Alken P; Köhrmann KU
    Eur Urol; 2002 Apr; 41(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 12074812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of prototype magnetic tool with conventional nitinol basket for ureteroscopic retrieval of stone fragments rendered paramagnetic with iron oxide microparticles.
    Tan YK; McLeroy SL; Faddegon S; Olweny E; Fernandez R; Beardsley H; Gnade B; Park S; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA
    J Urol; 2012 Aug; 188(2):648-52. PubMed ID: 22704446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preclinical Testing of a Combination Stone Basket and Ureteral Balloon to Extract Ureteral Stones.
    Massoudi R; Metzner TJ; Bonneau B; Ngo TC; Shinghal R; Leppert JT
    J Endourol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):96-99. PubMed ID: 29216731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval and releasing capabilities of stone-basket designs in vitro.
    Chenven ES; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 2005 Mar; 19(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 15798419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basket design as a factor in retention and release of calculi in vitro.
    Zeltser IS; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 17444783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management.
    Thomas JC; DeMarco RT; Donohoe JM; Adams MC; Brock JW; Pope JC
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1072-4. PubMed ID: 16094060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography.
    Rippel CA; Nikkel L; Lin YK; Danawala Z; Olorunnisomo V; Youssef RF; Pearle MS; Lotan Y; Raman JD
    J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2246-51. PubMed ID: 23083650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval capabilities of different stone basket designs in vitro.
    el-Gabry EA; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 1999 May; 13(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 10405911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel stone retrieval basket for more efficient lithotripsy procedures.
    Salimi N; Mahajan A; Don J; Schwartz B
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 19085204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tipless Nitinol Stone Baskets: Comparison of Penetration Force, Radial Dilation Force, Opening Dynamics, and Deflection.
    Patel N; Akhavein A; Hinck B; Jain R; Monga M
    Urology; 2017 May; 103():256-260. PubMed ID: 28104422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of nitinol tipless stone baskets in an in vitro caliceal model.
    Lukasewycz S; Skenazy J; Hoffman N; Kuskowski M; Hendlin K; Monga M
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):562-4. PubMed ID: 15247730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of nitinol stone retrieval baskets for flexible ureteroscopy.
    Netsch C; Herrera G; Gross AJ; Bach T
    J Endourol; 2011 Jul; 25(7):1217-20. PubMed ID: 21682599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments.
    Robert M; A'Ch S; Lanfrey P; Guiter J; Navratil H
    J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 10646673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The stone cone: a new generation of basketry.
    Dretler SP
    J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1593-6. PubMed ID: 11342924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of ureteral calculi with semirigid ureteroscopy: where should we stop?
    Yencilek F; Sarica K; Erturhan S; Yagci F; Erbagci A
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 20389152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.