183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24902399)
1. MicroCT-based comparison between fluorescence-aided caries excavation and conventional excavation.
Lai G; Kaisarly D; Xu X; Kunzelmann KH
Am J Dent; 2014 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 24902399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation.
Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 21111770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro-CT based quantitative evaluation of caries excavation.
Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; Vivan Cardoso M; Jaecques SV; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 20347481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE), caries detector, and conventional caries excavation in primary teeth.
Lennon AM; Attin T; Martens S; Buchalla W
Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 19722440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does DIAGNOdent provide a reliable caries-removal endpoint?
Neves AA; Coutinho E; De Munck J; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 21334416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantity of remaining bacteria and cavity size after excavation with FACE, caries detector dye and conventional excavation in vitro.
Lennon AM; Attin T; Buchalla W
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17555174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth.
Celiberti P; Francescut P; Lussi A
Caries Res; 2006; 40(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16508268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE) compared to conventional method.
Lennon AM
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 12877417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation.
Dammaschke T; Rodenberg TN; Schäfer E; Ott KH
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 16827030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of ceramic burs and conventional tungsten carbide bud burs in dentin caries excavation.
Dammaschke T; Vesnic A; Schafer E
Quintessence Int; 2008 Jun; 39(6):495-9. PubMed ID: 19057746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital image analysis method to assess the performance of conventional and self-limiting concepts in dentine caries removal.
Toledano M; Ghinea R; Cardona JC; Cabello I; Yamauti M; Pérez MM; Osorio R
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e31-8. PubMed ID: 23507398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs.
Meller C; Welk A; Zeligowski T; Splieth C
Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 17694212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micro-computerized tomography assessment of fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology: comparison with three other caries removal techniques.
Zhang X; Tu R; Yin W; Zhou X; Li X; Hu D
Aust Dent J; 2013 Dec; 58(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 24320903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. X-ray microtomography study to validate the efficacies of caries removal in primary molars by hand excavation and chemo-mechanical technique.
Ahmed M; Davis GR; Wong FS
Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 22922542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency of 4 caries excavation methods compared.
Lennon AM; Buchalla W; Rassner B; Becker K; Attin T
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 17024942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the efficiency of caries removal using an Er:YAG laser driven by fluorescence feedback control.
Schwass DR; Leichter JW; Purton DG; Swain MV
Arch Oral Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 23123070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro comparison of fluorescence-aided caries excavation and conventional excavation by microhardness testing.
Lai G; Zhu L; Xu X; Kunzelmann KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2014; 18(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 23703030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing two quantitative methods for studying remineralization of artificial caries.
Lo EC; Zhi QH; Itthagarun A
J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 20079396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A
J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria.
Banerjee A; Kidd EA; Watson TF
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 14579874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
