These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2490243)

  • 1. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance].
    Chabre C
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination].
    Altuğ Z; Işeri H; Bayazit Z; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonsurgical correction of a skeletal Class II, Division 1, malocclusion with bilateral crossbite and anterior open bite.
    Sabri R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 9714284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guiding occlusal development with functional appliances.
    Nielsen IL
    Aust Orthod J; 1996 Oct; 14(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 9528411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
    Hans MG; Kishiyama C; Parker SH; Wolf GR; Noachtar R
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The bionator with extraoral traction--the Wurzburg concept. 1].
    Witt E; Sahm G; Hevia R
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1990 Nov; 4(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 2135591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Severe dental Class II patient treated by activator followed by headgear therapy--a case report.
    Meller SM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8017344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical control with a headgear-activator combination.
    Chabre C
    J Clin Orthod; 1990 Oct; 24(10):618-24. PubMed ID: 2084151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.