These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2490243)

  • 21. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Treatment of Class 2-high Angle cases using the combined activator-occipital headgear].
    Dinçer M
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 2489131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skeletal, dental, and functional effects of headgear-activator therapy on Class II malocclusion in Japanese: a clinical case report.
    Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Sep; 100(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 1877554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion.
    Dolce C; Schader RE; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16102404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns.
    Dermaut LR; van den Eynde F; de Pauw G
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 1582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction].
    Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D
    Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vertical control in fully-banded orthodontic treatment.
    Pearson LE
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):205-24. PubMed ID: 3461731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of an anterior biteplate on dental and skeletal Class II correction using headgears: a cephalometric study.
    Thurman MM; King GJ; Ramsay DS; Wheeler TT; Phillips C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 22008301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
    Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
    Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study.
    Cura N; Sarac M; Oztürk Y; Sürmeli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul; 110(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 8686676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An evidence-based approach to treatment of open bite and deep bite: case reports.
    Hans MG; Teng CM; Liao CC; Chen YH; Yang CY
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 17373225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Erverdi N; Ozkan G
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study.
    Ulusoy C; Darendeliler N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):490.e9-15. PubMed ID: 18405811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.