These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24902965)

  • 1. MODFLOW-Based Coupled Surface Water Routing and Groundwater-Flow Simulation.
    Hughes JD; Langevin CD; White JT
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):452-63. PubMed ID: 24902965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear Flow Process: A New Package to Compute Nonlinear Flow in MODFLOW.
    Mayaud C; Walker P; Hergarten S; Birk S
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 25059312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discontinuous steady-state analytical solutions of the Boussinesq equation and their numerical representation by MODFLOW.
    Zaidel J
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(6):952-9. PubMed ID: 23387826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A MODFLOW Infiltration Device Package for Simulating Storm Water Infiltration.
    Jeppesen J; Christensen S
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):542-9. PubMed ID: 25187115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifications to the Conduit Flow Process Mode 2 for MODFLOW-2005.
    Reimann T; Birk S; Rehrl C; Shoemaker WB
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 21371024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approaches to the simulation of unconfined flow and perched groundwater flow in MODFLOW.
    Bedekar V; Niswonger RG; Kipp K; Panday S; Tonkin M
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 21635246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical study of groundwater flow cycling controlled by seawater/freshwater interaction in a coastal karst aquifer through conduit network using CFPv2.
    Xu Z; Hu BX; Davis H; Kish S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Nov; 182():131-45. PubMed ID: 26387032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Axisymmetric Modeling Using MODFLOW-USG.
    Bedekar V; Scantlebury L; Panday S
    Ground Water; 2019 Sep; 57(5):772-777. PubMed ID: 30653671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW: some considerations.
    Brunner P; Simmons CT; Cook PG; Therrien R
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19891721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow-Through Stream Modeling with MODFLOW and MT3D: Certainties and Limitations.
    Ben Simon R; Bernard S; Meurville C; Rebour V
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(6):967-71. PubMed ID: 25557038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting collector well yields with MODFLOW.
    Kelson V
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(6):918-26. PubMed ID: 22339406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulating the effect of climate extremes on groundwater flow through a lakebed.
    Virdi ML; Lee TM; Swancar A; Niswonger RG
    Ground Water; 2013 Mar; 51(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 22891702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new package in MODFLOW to simulate unconfined groundwater flow in sloping aquifers.
    Wang Q; Zhan H; Tang Z
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(6):924-35. PubMed ID: 24299562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accelerating groundwater flow simulation in MODFLOW using JASMIN-based parallel computing.
    Cheng T; Mo Z; Shao J
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 23600445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone into the "HYDRUS Package for MODFLOW".
    Beegum S; Šimůnek J; Szymkiewicz A; Sudheer KP; Nambi IM
    Ground Water; 2019 May; 57(3):392-408. PubMed ID: 30062703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the MODFLOW-2005 Conduit Flow Process.
    Hill ME; Stewart MT; Martin A
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):549-59. PubMed ID: 20113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the new analytical solution for a well in Cartesian coordinates with MODFLOW comparisons.
    Batu V
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(6):916-23. PubMed ID: 24236933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Simulating piecewise-linear surface water and groundwater interactions with MODFLOW," by W.J. Zaadnoordijk, September-October 2009, v. 47, no. 5: 723-726.
    Rushton K
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):796-7; discussion 797-8. PubMed ID: 20678142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification and quantification of base flow using carbon isotopes.
    Meredith EL; Kuzara SL
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(6):959-65. PubMed ID: 22671689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A hybrid finite-difference and analytic element groundwater model.
    Haitjema HM; Feinstein DT; Hunt RJ; Gusyev MA
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 20132324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.