BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24903202)

  • 1. Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Broekmans FJ; Verweij PJ; Eijkemans MJ; Mannaerts BM; Witjes H
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1688-97. PubMed ID: 24903202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone.
    Hamdine O; Eijkemans MJ; Lentjes EW; Torrance HL; Macklon NS; Fauser BC; Broekmans FJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 25355590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of prognostic modelling of high and low ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for IVF.
    Scheinhardt MO; Lerman T; König IR; Griesinger G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1499-1505. PubMed ID: 30007353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of gonadotropin type on progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles.
    Lawrenz B; Beligotti F; Engelmann N; Gates D; Fatemi HM
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2554-2560. PubMed ID: 27619773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Bryndorf T; Løssl K; Roskær J; Holland T; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1253-64. PubMed ID: 27060174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
    Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vuong TN; Phung HT; Ho MT
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 25740882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recombinant LH supplementation to a standard GnRH antagonist protocol in women of 35 years or older undergoing IVF/ICSI: a randomized controlled multicentre study.
    König TE; van der Houwen LE; Overbeek A; Hendriks ML; Beutler-Beemsterboer SN; Kuchenbecker WK; Renckens CN; Bernardus RE; Schats R; Homburg R; Hompes PG; Lambalk CB
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2804-12. PubMed ID: 23838159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Drakopoulos P; Vuong TNL; Ho NAV; Vaiarelli A; Ho MT; Blockeel C; Camus M; Lam AT; van de Vijver A; Humaidan P; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2225-2233. PubMed ID: 29040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of early versus late initiation of GnRH antagonist co-treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hamdine O; Macklon NS; Eijkemans MJ; Laven JS; Cohlen BJ; Verhoeff A; van Dop PA; Bernardus RE; Lambalk CB; Oosterhuis GJ; Holleboom CA; van den Dool-Maasland GC; Verburg HJ; van der Heijden PF; Blankhart A; Fauser BC; Broekmans FJ;
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3227-35. PubMed ID: 24129613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cumulative delivery rate per aspiration IVF/ICSI cycle in POSEIDON patients: a real-world evidence study of 9073 patients.
    Esteves SC; Yarali H; Vuong LN; Carvalho JF; Özbek İY; Polat M; Le HL; Pham TD; Ho TM; Humaidan P; Alviggi C
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2157-2169. PubMed ID: 34179973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
    Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized, controlled, first-in-patient trial of choriogonadotropin beta added to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol.
    Fernández Sánchez M; Višnová H; Larsson P; Yding Andersen C; Filicori M; Blockeel C; Pinborg A; Khalaf Y; Mannaerts B;
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1161-1174. PubMed ID: 35451013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serum progesterone is lower in ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG compared to recombinant FSH owing to a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bosch E; Alamá P; Romero JL; Marí M; Labarta E; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 38037188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.
    Humaidan P; Chin W; Rogoff D; D'Hooghe T; Longobardi S; Hubbard J; Schertz J;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):544-555. PubMed ID: 28137754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Oehninger S; Nelson SM; Verweij P; Stegmann BJ
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Oct; 13():117. PubMed ID: 26520396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting suboptimal oocyte yield following GnRH agonist trigger by measuring serum LH at the start of ovarian stimulation.
    Popovic-Todorovic B; Santos-Ribeiro S; Drakopoulos P; De Vos M; Racca A; Mackens S; Thorrez Y; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Quintero L; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2027-2035. PubMed ID: 31560740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Treated with Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH in a GnRH Antagonist Protocol.
    Griesinger G; Verweij PJ; Gates D; Devroey P; Gordon K; Stegmann BJ; Tarlatzis BC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149615. PubMed ID: 26950065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High ovarian response does not jeopardize ongoing pregnancy rates and increases cumulative pregnancy rates in a GnRH-antagonist protocol.
    Fatemi HM; Doody K; Griesinger G; Witjes H; Mannaerts B
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):442-52. PubMed ID: 23136144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.