These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24903354)

  • 1. Immediate and 12 months follow up of function and lead integrity after cranial MRI in 356 patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers.
    Muehling OM; Wakili R; Greif M; von Ziegler F; Morhard D; Brueckmann H; Becker A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jun; 16(1):39. PubMed ID: 24903354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.
    Nazarian S; Hansford R; Roguin A; Goldsher D; Zviman MM; Lardo AC; Caffo BS; Frick KD; Kraut MA; Kamel IR; Calkins H; Berger RD; Bluemke DA; Halperin HR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):415-24. PubMed ID: 21969340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multicenter study of the safety and effects of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary sinus left ventricular pacing leads.
    Sheldon SH; Bunch TJ; Cogert GA; Acker NG; Dalzell CM; Higgins JV; Espinosa RE; Asirvatham SJ; Cha YM; Felmlee JP; Watson RE; Anderson JL; Brooks MH; Osborn JS; Friedman PA
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Feb; 12(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 25433144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Experimental and clinical investigations at 1.5 Tesla].
    Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Yang A; Nähle CP; Skowasch D; Meyer C; Schimpf R; Schild H; Sommer T
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 15871088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the risks of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Cohen JD; Costa HS; Russo RJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1631-6. PubMed ID: 22921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging scanning on different body regions in patients with pacemakers.
    Ning X; Li X; Fan X; Chen K; Hua W; Liu Z; Dai Y; Chen X; Lu M; Zhao S; Zhang S
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Sep; 61(3):545-550. PubMed ID: 32808082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monocenter feasibility study of the MRI compatibility of the Evia pacemaker in combination with Safio S pacemaker lead.
    Wollmann CG; Steiner E; Vock P; Ndikung B; Mayr H
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Sep; 14(1):67. PubMed ID: 23009683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical safety of the ProMRI pacemaker system in patients subjected to thoracic spine and cardiac 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging scanning conditions.
    Bailey WM; Mazur A; McCotter C; Woodard PK; Rosenthal L; Johnson W; Mela T;
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):464-71. PubMed ID: 26409098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safe performance of magnetic resonance of the heart in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemaker systems: the safety issue of the ESTIMATE study.
    Wollmann CG; Thudt K; Kaiser B; Salomonowitz E; Mayr H; Globits S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 May; 16(1):30. PubMed ID: 24886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Present day pacemakers for pulse generator exchange: is 3.5 V a sufficient nominal setting for the pulse amplitude? Thera Pacemaker Study Group.
    Schuchert A; Van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1824-7. PubMed ID: 8945049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical safety of an MRI conditional implantable cardioverter defibrillator system: A prospective Monocenter ICD-Magnetic resonance Imaging feasibility study (MIMI).
    Kypta A; Blessberger H; Hoenig S; Saleh K; Lambert T; Kammler J; Fellner F; Lichtenauer M; Steinwender C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):574-84. PubMed ID: 26335332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla.
    Martin ET; Coman JA; Shellock FG; Pulling CC; Fair R; Jenkins K
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 43(7):1315-24. PubMed ID: 15063447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monocenter Investigation Micra® MRI study (MIMICRY): feasibility study of the magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of a leadless pacemaker system.
    Blessberger H; Kiblboeck D; Reiter C; Lambert T; Kellermair J; Schmit P; Fellner F; Lichtenauer M; Kypta A; Steinwender C; Kammler J
    Europace; 2019 Jan; 21(1):137-141. PubMed ID: 29986008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
    Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Very high pacing thresholds during long-term follow-up predicted by a combination of implant pacing threshold and impedance in leadless transcatheter pacemakers.
    Tolosana JM; Guasch E; San Antonio R; Apolo J; Pujol-López M; Chipa-Ccasani F; Trucco E; Roca-Luque I; Brugada J; Mont L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):868-874. PubMed ID: 31967367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices.
    Do DH; Eyvazian V; Bayoneta AJ; Hu P; Finn JP; Bradfield JS; Shivkumar K; Boyle NG
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Feb; 15(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29017930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficiency of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac rhythm management devices.
    Schukro C; Puchner SB
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():96-100. PubMed ID: 31439265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic measurement of atrial pacing thresholds in dual-chamber pacemakers: clinical experience with atrial capture management.
    Sperzel J; Milasinovic G; Smith TW; Mead H; Brandt J; Haisty WK; Bailey JR; Roelke M; Simonson J; Englund J; Farges E; Compton S
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Nov; 2(11):1203-10. PubMed ID: 16253910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deactivation vs. asynchronous pacing - prospective evaluation of a protocol for rhythm management in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemakers undergoing adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Klein-Wiele O; Garmer M; Barbone G; Urbien R; Busch M; Kara K; Schäfer H; Schulte-Hermes M; Hailer B; Grönemeyer D
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jun; 17(1):142. PubMed ID: 28577544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.