BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24903689)

  • 1. Optimal sample size allocation for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Shieh G; Jan SL
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 24903689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):114. PubMed ID: 27578357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal sample sizes for precise interval estimation of Welch's procedure under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Shieh G; Jan SL
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 21805061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum allocation of treatments for Welch's test in equivalence assessment.
    Dette H; Munk A
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1143-50. PubMed ID: 9333344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination in step-up testing procedures for multiple comparisons with a control.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Wen MJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2743-56. PubMed ID: 20799258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal sample sizes for the design of reliability studies: power consideration.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):772-85. PubMed ID: 24197712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the weighted eta-squared effect sizes in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 22806705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size planning for the noninferiority or equivalence of a linear contrast with cost considerations.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 26121080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal contrast analysis with heterogeneous variances and budget concerns.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214391. PubMed ID: 30913244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphical displays for clarifying how allocation ratio affects total sample size for the two sample logrank test.
    Saville BR; Kim YS; Koch GG
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 20077513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power and sample size determination for noninferiority trials using an exact method.
    Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12477069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):316-332. PubMed ID: 31190402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing cost-efficiency in mean exposure assessment--cost functions reconsidered.
    Mathiassen SE; Bolin K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():76. PubMed ID: 21600023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculation in cost-effectiveness cluster randomized trials: optimal and maximin approaches.
    Manju MA; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2538-53. PubMed ID: 25019136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.