These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24903693)

  • 21. Is exploratory factor analysis always to be preferred? A systematic comparison of factor analytic techniques throughout the confirmatory-exploratory continuum.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37227893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Permutimin: Factor Rotation to Simple Structure with Permutation of Variables.
    Yamashita N; Adachi K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31021266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: factor recovery with small sample sizes.
    Preacher KJ; MacCallum RC
    Behav Genet; 2002 Mar; 32(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 12036113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.
    Valdebenito S; Eisner M; Farrington DP; Ttofi MM; Sutherland A
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):i-216. PubMed ID: 37131379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unrestricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items based on an objectively refined target matrix.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):116-130. PubMed ID: 30784018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
    Rodríguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement.
    Knapp TR; Sawilowsky SS
    J Nurs Meas; 2004; 12(2):95-6; author reply 97-9. PubMed ID: 16092708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo simulation of expected outcomes with the AcrySof toric intraocular lens.
    Hill W; Potvin R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 8():22. PubMed ID: 18954445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coaching Competency and (Exploratory) Structural Equation Modeling: A Substantive-Methodological Synergy.
    Myers ND
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2013 Sep; 14(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 23794951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing Methods for Modeling Acquiescence in Multidimensional Partially Balanced Scales.
    de la Fuente J; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2020 Nov; 32(4):590-597. PubMed ID: 33073766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Heywood you go away! Examining causes, effects, and treatments for Heywood cases in exploratory factor analysis.
    Cooperman AW; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):156-176. PubMed ID: 34197140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Sandwich Standard Error Estimator for Exploratory Factor Analysis With Nonnormal Data and Imperfect Models.
    Zhang G; Preacher KJ; Hattori M; Jiang G; Trichtinger LA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):360-373. PubMed ID: 31235982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating the impacts of intrafraction motion on dosimetric outcomes when treating small targets with virtual cones.
    Church C; Parsons D; Syme A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 22(8):60-71. PubMed ID: 34272811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monte Carlo simulations using extant data to mimic populations: Applications to the modified linear probability model and logistic regression.
    Jaccard J; Brinberg M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):450-465. PubMed ID: 33829812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification.
    Ximénez C
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identification of Facet Models by Means of Factor Rotation: A Simulation Study and Data Analysis of a Test for the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure.
    Beauducel A; Kersting M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 80(5):995-1019. PubMed ID: 32855568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions.
    Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Aug; 24(4):468-491. PubMed ID: 30667242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.