These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24903695)

  • 1. Four types of manipulability ratings and naming latencies for a set of 560 photographs of objects.
    Guérard K; Lagacé S; Brodeur MB
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):443-70. PubMed ID: 24903695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manipulability agreement as a predictor of action initiation latency.
    Guérard K; Brodeur MB
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):572-9. PubMed ID: 24942247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects.
    Salmon JP; McMullen PA; Filliter JH
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 20160288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Norms for grip agreement for 296 photographs of objects.
    Lagacé S; Downing-Doucet F; Guérard K
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):772-81. PubMed ID: 23239071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
    Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Manipulability Effect in Object Naming.
    Lorenzoni A; Peressotti F; Navarrete E
    J Cogn; 2018 May; 1(1):30. PubMed ID: 31517203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is it that color determinants determine? The relation between the rorschach inkblot method and cognitive object-recognition processes.
    Kron A; Cohen A; Benziman H; Ben-Shakhar G
    J Pers Assess; 2009 Mar; 91(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 19205934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects.
    Masson ME; Bub DN; Breuer AT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1470-84. PubMed ID: 21553988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.
    Pecher D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 22612171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action and object naming in Parkinson's disease without dementia.
    Cotelli M; Borroni B; Manenti R; Zanetti M; Arévalo A; Cappa SF; Padovani A
    Eur J Neurol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):632-7. PubMed ID: 17539940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
    Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manipulating color and other visual information influences picture naming at different levels of processing: evidence from Alzheimer subjects and normal controls.
    Zannino GD; Perri R; Salamone G; Di Lorenzo C; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2571-8. PubMed ID: 20457164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Features of planned hand actions influence identification of graspable objects.
    Bub DN; Masson ME; Lin T
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1269-76. PubMed ID: 23696201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural basis for simulated drawing and the semantic implications.
    Harrington GS; Farias D; Davis CH
    Cortex; 2009 Mar; 45(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 19111291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A motor isolation effect: when object manipulability modulates recall performance.
    Guérard K; Lagacé S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2439-54. PubMed ID: 25176227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of surface characteristics and style of production on naming and verification of pictorial stimuli.
    Brodie EE; Wallace AM; Sharrat B
    Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(4):517-45. PubMed ID: 1793125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations.
    Damasio H; Grabowski TJ; Tranel D; Ponto LL; Hichwa RD; Damasio AR
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1053-64. PubMed ID: 11352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of object similarity in the production and identification of actions associated with objects.
    Desmarais G; Pensa MC; Dixon MJ; Roy EA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):1021-34. PubMed ID: 17942020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A domain-specific system for representing knowledge of both man-made objects and human actions. Evidence from a case with an association of deficits.
    Vannuscorps G; Pillon A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2321-41. PubMed ID: 21540045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pool of pairs of related objects (POPORO) for investigating visual semantic integration: behavioral and electrophysiological validation.
    Kovalenko LY; Chaumon M; Busch NA
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jul; 25(3):272-84. PubMed ID: 22218845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.